Social interactions in the metaverse: Framework, initial evidence, and research roadmap

Author:

Hennig-Thurau ThorstenORCID,Aliman Dorothea N.,Herting Alina M.,Cziehso Gerrit P.,Linder Marc,Kübler Raoul V.

Abstract

AbstractReal-time multisensory social interactions (RMSIs) between people are at the center of the metaverse, a new computer-mediated environment consisting of virtual “worlds” in which people act and communicate with each other in real-time via avatars. This research investigates whether RMSIs in the metaverse, when accessed through virtual-reality headsets, can generate more value for interactants in terms of interaction outcomes (interaction performance, evaluation, and emotional responses) than those on the two-dimensional (2D) internet (e.g., Zoom meetings). We combine theoretical logic with extensive field-experimental probes (which support the value-creation potential of the virtual-reality metaverse, but contradict itsgeneralsuperiority) to develop and refine a framework of how RMSIs in the metaverse versus on the 2D internet affect interaction outcomes through interactants’ intermediate conditions. The refined framework serves as foundation for a research roadmap on RMSIs in the metaverse, in which we highlight the critical roles of specific mediating and moderating forces along with interactional formats for future investigations of the metaverse and also name key business areas and societal challenges that deserve scholarly attention.

Funder

Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management

Reference151 articles.

1. Abdullah, A., Kolkmeier, J., Lo, V., & Neff, M. (2021). Videoconference and embodied VR: Communication patterns across task and medium. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction., 5(CSCW2), 1–29.

2. Al-Jundi, H. A., & Tanbour, E. Y. (2022). A framework for fidelity evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems. Virtual Reality, 26, 1103–1122.

3. Allenby, G. M., & Rossi, P. E. (1998). Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1), 57–78.

4. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

5. Amenabar, T., & Lee, J. (2022). ‘Fortnite’: Battle royale, concert venue and, maybe, the start of the metaverse. Washington Post. Retrieved September 28, 2022 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/interactive/2022/fortnite-anniversary-epic-games/

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3