Abstract
AbstractIn this article we advocate a return to the consideration and examination of the basic building blocks of archaeological enquiry: the evidence. Reacting to a widely held perception that archaeology now understands various commonalities of human experience, we suggest that such concepts and the inevitable oscillation towards “big picture” approaches that stems from them are problematic. They engender a type of scholarship that does not always engage fully with the evidentiary bases of interpretation and that risks assuming a great deal about large parts of the world that have not been studied in as much detail as others. We explore this by looking at the South Asian context, where archaeologists are forced to contend with a number of constraints, chief among which is a relative absence of archaeological evidence. Focusing on one particular sub-region, we piece together exactly what evidence exists and consider what can (and cannot) be said from it. On one level this serves as a useful comparator for those working in other parts of the world who may not appreciate the evidentiary constraints that exist elsewhere. Yet beyond this and simple questions of analogy, we suggest that detailed consideration of an area such as the one presented here forces us to return to even more fundamental questions relating to when archaeological research becomes “interesting”, “ground-breaking”, and “new”; and who decides this.
Funder
FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference162 articles.
1. Abbas, R. 2016. Report on archaeological explorations of ancient sites of Vidarbha region, Maharashtra. Unpublished report submitted to the Archaeological Survey of India. Nasik: Indian Numismatic, Historical, Cultural Research Foundation.
2. Adams, R. 1981. Heartland of cities: Surveys of ancient settlement and land use on the central flood plain of the Euphrates. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
3. Agrawal, A. 1989. Rise and Fall of the Imperial Guptas. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
4. Ali, D. 2012. The historiography of the medieval in South Asia. J R Asiat Soc 22 (1): 7–12.
5. Ammerman, A.J., and L.L. Cavali-Sforza. 1971. Measuring the rate of spread of early farming in Europe. Man 6 (4): 674–688.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献