Abstract
AbstractRemanufacturing includes disassembly and reassembly of used products to save natural resources and reduce emissions. While assembly is widely understood in the field of operations management, disassembly is a rather new problem in production planning and control. The latter faces the challenge of high uncertainty of type, quantity and quality conditions of returned products, leading to high volatility in remanufacturing production systems. Traditionally, disassembly is a manual labor-intensive production step that, thanks to advances in robotics and artificial intelligence, starts to be automated with autonomous workstations. Due to the diverging material flow, the application of production systems with loosely linked stations is particularly suitable and, owing to the risk of condition induced operational failures, the rise of hybrid disassembly systems that combine manual and autonomous workstations can be expected. In contrast to traditional workstations, autonomous workstations can expand their capabilities but suffer from unknown failure rates. For such adverse conditions a condition-based control for hybrid disassembly systems, based on reinforcement learning, alongside a comprehensive modeling approach is presented in this work. The method is applied to a real-world production system. By comparison with a heuristic control approach, the potential of the RL approach can be proven simulatively using two different test cases.
Funder
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Software
Reference64 articles.
1. Altekin, F. T., & Akkan, C. (2012). Task-failure-driven rebalancing of disassembly lines. International Journal of Production Research, 50, 4955–4976. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.616915.
2. Altenmüller, T., Stüker, T., Waschneck, B., Kuhnle, A., & Lanza, G. (2020). Reinforcement learning for an intelligent and autonomous production control of complex job-shops under time constraints. Production Engineering, 14, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-020-00967-8.
3. Apple Inc. (2019). Environmental Responsibility Report: 2019 Progress Report, covering fiscal year 2018. Cupertino, CA. https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Responsibility_Report_2019.pdf. Accessed 21 November 2020.
4. Aytug, H., Lawley, M. A., McKay, K., Mohan, S., & Uzsoy, R. (2005). Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 161, 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.027.
5. Bdiwi, M., Rashid, A., & Putz, M. (2016). Autonomous disassembly of electric vehicle motors based on robot cognition. In A. Okamura & A. Menciassi (Eds.), 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden, 5/16/2016 - 5/21/2016 (pp. 2500–2505). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487404.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献