Demonstrating the Cognitive Plausibility of Interactive System Specifications

Author:

Butterworth Richard1,Blandford Ann1,Duke David2

Affiliation:

1. School of Computing Science, Middlesex University, London, UK, , , , , , GB

2. Department of Computer Science, University of York, York, UK, , , , , , GB

Abstract

Abstract. Much of the behaviour of an interactive system is determined by its user population. This paper describes how assumptions about the user can be brought into system models in order to reason about their behaviour. We describe a system model containing reasonable assumptions about the user as being ‘cognitively plausible’. Before asserting the plausibility of a model however we must first be able to make the assumptions made in that model inspectable. There is a tension between the inspectability of user assumptions and the tractability of models; inspectable models tend to not be very tractable and vice versa . We describe how we can get round this tension, by deriving tractable models from explicit user assumptions. The resulting models may not of themselves be very inspectable to human-factors workers, but the process by which they are derived is inspectable. Hence we claim that we can have both tractability and inspectability. We exemplify our claims using a simple cognitive model and ‘Meeting Maker’, an interactive electronic diary system.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Theoretical Computer Science,Software

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Multifaceted Formal Methods and their Interdisciplinary Role — from the Cathedral of ‘Components as Coalgebras’ to the HCI Context and the Open Source Software Bazaar;Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming;2024-09

2. Modelling and Analysing Cognition and Interaction;Formal Methods for an Informal World;2023

3. Formal Methods for Human-Computer Interaction;Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series;2022

4. How to Formally Model Human in Collaborative Robotics;Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science;2020-12-03

5. Safety Assessment of Collaborative Robotics Through Automated Formal Verification;IEEE Transactions on Robotics;2020-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3