Coupling engagement with analytical rigor: advancing research on religion and entrepreneurship using a mechanism-based approach

Author:

Dejardin Marcus,Hoogendoorn Brigitte,Janssen Frank,Rietveld Cornelius A.,van Burg Elco

Abstract

AbstractSecularization processes alongside supposed tensions between science and religion may partly explain the slow development of literature on the relationship between religion and entrepreneurship. Nevertheless, the overwhelming number of submissions we received for the present special issue of Small Business Economics suggests a profound interest in this topic by researchers from all around the globe. In many of these submissions, the researcher’s own personal values or beliefs explicitly or implicitly motivated the research question, shaped the research design, and steered the interpretation of outcomes – regrettably, although this engagement often being at the expense of the study’s analytical rigor. We explain how the Weberian distinction between value-neutrality and value-relevance can help to increase the rigor of studies on the relationship between religion and entrepreneurship. Moreover, we propose a mechanism-based approach to explain and test the multiple interrelationships between religion and entrepreneurship because such mechanisms are often assumed rather than empirically tested. By drawing on and extending Saroglou’s religious dimensions model, we structure potential mechanisms between religion and entrepreneurship as well as between entrepreneurship and religion.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference91 articles.

1. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (1995). On being a scientist: Responsible conduct in research. National Academy Press.

2. Anggadwita, G., Dana, L.-P., Ramadani, V., & Ramadan, R. Y. (2021). Empowering Islamic boarding schools by applying the humane entrepreneurship approach: The case of Indonesia. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(6), 1580–1604.

3. Astin, A. W., Astin, H. S., Lindholm, J. A., Bryant, A. N., Calderone, S., & Szelenyi, K. (2006). Spirituality and the professoriate: A national study of faculty beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.

4. Audretsch, D. B., Bönte, W., & Tamvada, J. P. (2013). Religion, social class and entrepreneurial choice. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(6), 774–789.

5. Audretsch, D. B., Obschonka, M., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2017). A new perspective on entrepreneurial regions: Linking cultural identity with latent and manifest entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 48(3), 681–697.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3