Abstract
AbstractIn response to the ongoing decline of fauna worldwide, there has been growing interest in the rewilding of whole ecosystems outside of fenced sanctuaries or offshore islands. This interest will inevitably result in attempts to restore species where eliminating threats from predators and competitors is extremely challenging or impossible, or reintroductions of predators that will increase predation risk for extant prey (i.e., coexistence conservation). We propose ‘Mini Safe Havens’ (MSHs) as a potential tool for managing these threats. Mini Safe Havens are refuges that are permanently permeable to the focal species; allowing the emigration of individuals while maintaining gene flow through the boundary. Crucial to the effectiveness of the approach is the ongoing maintenance and monitoring required to preserve a low-to-zero risk of key threats within the MSH; facilitating in-situ learning and adaptation by focal species to these threats, at a rate and intensity of exposure determined by the animals themselves. We trialled the MSH approach for a pilot reintroduction of the Australian native New Holland mouse (Pseudomys novaehollandiae), in the context of a trophic rewilding project to address potential naïveté to a reintroduced native mammalian predator. We found that mice released into a MSH maintained their weight and continued to use the release site beyond 17 months (525 days) post-release. In contrast, individuals in temporary soft-release enclosures tended to lose weight and became undetectable approximately 1-month post-release. We discuss the broad applicability of MSHs for population recovery and reintroductions ‘beyond-the-fence’ and recommend avenues for further refinement of the approach.
Funder
Ecological Society of Australia
Australian Wildlife Society
ACT Government
Bunnings
Australian Research Council
Australian Government
Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University
Australian National University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference116 articles.
1. Abicair K, Manning AD, Ford F, Newport J, Banks SC (2020) Habitat selection and genetic diversity of a reintroduced ‘refugee species’. Anim Conserv 23:330–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12550
2. Agarwal K, Bode M (2019) Modelling the effects of leaky predator-exclusion fences and their surrounding halo. https://doi.org/10.1101/737924. bioRxiv [preprint]
3. Arthur AD, Pech RP, Dickman CR (2005) Effects of predation and habitat structure on the population dynamics of house mice in large outdoor enclosures. Oikos 108:562–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13327.x
4. Batson WG, Gordon IJ, Fletcher DB, Manning AD (2015) Review: translocation tactics: a framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. J Appl Ecol 52:1598–1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12498
5. Batson W, Fletcher D, Portas T, Crisp H, Ryan S, Wimpenny C, Gordon I, Manning A (2016) Re-introduction of eastern bettong to a critically endangered woodland habitat in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. In: Soorae PS (ed) Global Re-Introduction Perspectives: 2016. case-studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment AgencyAbu Dhabi, Gland, pp 172–177
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献