Abstract
AbstractSpecies-rich calcareous grasslands in Europe strongly declined during the twentieth century due to drastic land use changes. Many grasslands were converted into more productive pastures or are covered by shrubs or forests today, since they were overgrown after abandonment or afforested. Restoration of calcareous grasslands by shrub or forest clearing and subsequent recolonization of grassland species from adjacent grasslands is, therefore, an important conservation approach. Restored populations of calcareous grassland species may, however, differ from their source populations in genetic diversity and differentiation due to potential founder and bottleneck effects. In our study we analyzed, therefore, the impact of restoration by forest clearing and natural recolonization on the genetic variation of three common calcareous grassland species (Agrimonia eupatoria, Campanula rotundifolia, and Knautia arvensis) without a contribution of persistent seed bank, in South Western Germany. We used molecular markers AFLPs (Amplified fragment length polymorphisms) to compare genetic diversity within and differentiation between spontaneously recovered subpopulations with adjacent historically old, natural subpopulations at eight study sites. Restored parts of the grasslands have been re-established during the 1990s. Molecular markers revealed broadly similar levels of genetic diversity in source and restored subpopulations of the study species. Only A. eupatoria exhibited slightly higher diversity in restored subpopulations, which may be explained by higher dispersal potential due to the hooky fruits of the species. Genetic differentiation between source and restored subpopulations was not significant, indicating strong gene flow between the subpopulations. Our study underlines, therefore, that restoration of calcareous grasslands by natural recolonization after forest clearing is an efficient method to re-establish genetically variable subpopulations comparable to their sources.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference95 articles.
1. Aavik T, Helm A (2018) Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape-scale dispersal. Restor Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12634
2. Albert Á-J, Mudrák O, Jongepierová I, Fajmon K, Frei I, Ševčíková M, Klimešová J, Doležal J (2019) Grassland restoration on ex-arable land by transfer of brush-harvested propagules and green hay. Agric Ecosyst & Environ 272:74–82
3. Bakker JP, Poschlod P, Strykstra RJ, Bekker RM, Thompson K (1996) Seed banks and seed dispersal: important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Botanica Neerl 45(4):461–490
4. Basey A, Fant J, Kramer A (2015) Producing native plant materials for restoration: 10 rules to collect and maintain genetic diversity. Native Plants J 16:37–53
5. Bishop JG (1996) Demographic and population genetic variation during colonization by the herb Lupinus lepidus on Mount St. Helens. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c3a4d3e7c59cd3c507920d3255e1cab8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Accessed 12 May 2021
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献