Abstract
AbstractTeotihuacan, the main city of the Classic period in Central Mexico (ca. 150/200–650 CE), was among many things, a colorful city. Through its application on mural painting, ceramics, lapidary, bone, textiles, and the human body itself, coloring materials gave meaning to the Teotihuacan reality. This research presents color as a socio-technological phenomenon from the archaeology of color, the anthropology of technology, and the application of the concept of technological style.From this scope, pictorial palettes of mural painting fragments from three Teotihuacan architectural compounds were studied by digital microscopy, colorimetry, fiber optic reflectance spectroscopy (FORS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Raman spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) in order to identify the color technology of pigments. This approach led us to identify materials shared by the three studied compounds, red and yellow earths, cinnabar, malachite, pseudomalachite, azurite, and the Teotihuacan grayish blue, found to contain a mix of bone black with calcite. Our results contribute to the discussion on the use of raw materials and their mixtures. We observed a standardization of pigment technology in Teotihuacan mural painting through the use of shared and standard formulations with four indicators that we propose as markers of a technological style for pigments, along with variations in the color materials that evidence the use of different strategies for the procurement and distribution of raw materials among the diverse architectural assemblages of the city.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archeology,Anthropology,Archeology
Reference107 articles.
1. Aceto M, Agostino A, Fenoglio G, Idone A, Gulmini M, Picollo M, Ricciardi P, Delaney JK (2014) Characterisation of colourants on illuminated manuscripts by portable fibre optic UV-visible-NIR reflectance spectrophotometry. Anal Methods 6(5):1488–1500. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41904e
2. Álvarez Icaza Longoria MI, Escalante P (2017) Estilo y región en el arte mesoamericano, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City.
3. Angulo Villaseñor J (1987) Observaciones sobre el Templo de la Agricultura en Teotihuacan. In: McClung de Tapia E, Rattray EC (eds) Teotihuacán. Nuevos datos, nuevas síntesis, nuevos problemas. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, pp 275–315.
4. Angulo Villaseñor J (1995) La pictografía en Teotihuacan. Arqueología Mexicana III(16):24–29
5. Angulo Villaseñor J (1996) Teotihuacan. Aspectos de la cultura a través de la expresión pictórica. In: de la Fuente B (ed) La pintura mural prehispánica en México. Teotihuacan. Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, pp 65–186