Abstract
AbstractHorse tooth retouchers have been identified in several Middle and Upper Palaeolithic sites. They have been typically characterised as ‘soft’ hammers and/or grouped into the category of ‘bone retouchers’ at a technical level. Bone and teeth have different chemical compositions; teeth are denser and heavier than bone, and consequently, their technological features should not be considered homologous. In this work, we experimentally tested the effectiveness of horse teeth as retouchers. To perform this study, we used 41 modern horse teeth to shape flakes of various raw materials by applying different techniques. The resulting use-wear traces were analysed using high-resolution methods and then characterised. The results allowed us to identify the effectiveness of hypsodont teeth in knapping a wide range of tools and to evaluate the influence of 1) the raw materials, 2) the retouching techniques and 3) the gestures of the different knappers on the morphology of the use-wear marks. This work sheds light on the purpose of using teeth as tools by both Neanderthal and early modern human populations as well as understanding how these human species used them. The study leads us to consider tooth retouchers as important elements of the chaîne opératoire in lithic manufacture. Our goal is to highlight the importance of these types of experimental studies to create analogies and infer past processes.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Spanish Ministry of Education and Vocational Training
MINECO/FEDER
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Generalitat de Catalunya-AGAUR
Spanish MINECO/FEDER
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference73 articles.
1. Abrams G, Cattelain P (2014) Le Trou de l’Abîme à Couvin (Prov. Namur, Belgique). Bilan archéozoologique préliminaire de la couche II (fouilles 1984–1987). Archéo-Situla 34:33–40
2. Abrams G, Bello SM, Di Modica K, Pirson S, Bonjean D (2014) When Neanderthals used cave bear (Ursus spelaeus) remains: bone retouchers from unit 5 of Scladina Cave (Belgium). Quat Int 326–327:274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.10.022
3. Abrams G (2023) Close encounters of the third kind?: Neanderthals and modern humans in Belgium, a bone story. Doctoral Thesis. Leiden University. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/3618716
4. Ahern JCM, Karavanić I, Paunović M, Janković I, Smith FH (2004) New discoveries and interpretations of hominid fossils and artifacts from Vindija cave. Croatia J Hum Evol 46(1):25–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2003.09.010
5. Andrews P (1995) Experiments in taphonomy. J Archaeol Sci 22(2):147–153. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1995.0016
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献