Australian Digital Mental Health Services: Consumer Perceptions of Their Usability and Acceptability

Author:

Ftanou MariaORCID,Machlin Anna,Mangelsdorf Shaminka N.,Morgan Amy,Bassilios Bridget

Abstract

AbstractDigital mental health interventions are effective and can greatly enhance access to mental health care. They can reach people in remote and low-income areas and reduce the stigma of seeking mental health help by offering anonymity. Despite these benefits, they have not been fully integrated into mental health service delivery. The aim of this study was to understand consumers’ experiences and perceptions of accessing care through digital mental health services. Consumers of three key Australian Digital Mental Health Services completed an online survey about their experience receiving mental health care through digital mental health services. Some consumers were also invited to elaborate on their responses by taking part in a phone interview. A total of 351 participants completed an online survey (overall response rate of 11% of all those invited to take part), and 23 participants of whom also completed a phone interview. Most consumers were female and under the age of 50 years. Overall, consumers were very positive about their experience of using digital mental health services. They appreciated the accessibility, convenience, self-paced nature, therapeutic support, and guidance. Most found the services user-friendly, easy to use and navigate and were satisfied with their experience. A small number of consumers experienced difficulties with technology and internet connections. Most consumers would recommend services to their peers and recommend that digital mental health services be better promoted to improve awareness. Digital mental health services have a vital role in mental health care provision. Further research is needed to examine how digital mental health services can cater to the specific needs of disadvantaged sub-populations and diverse cultural populations and be seamlessly implemented in mental health care systems.

Funder

Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government

University of Melbourne

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. Australian Productivity Commission. (2020). Mental Health, Report no. 95. Retrieved from Canberra. https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/mental-health/report

2. Bassilios, B., Ftanou, M., Tan, A., Morgan, A., Machlin, A., Mangelsdorf, S., . . . Pirkis, J. (2022a). Environmental scan of digital mental health services. Retrieved from Melbourne.

3. Bassilios, B., Morgan, A., Tan, A., Ftanou, M., Krysinska, K., Le, L., . . . Pirkis, J. (2022b). Literature review of effectiveness of supported digital mental health interventions (DMHIs). Retrieved from Melbourne.

4. Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., O’Dea, B., Larsen, M. E., D, J. K., Titov, N., March, S., Hickie, I., Teesson, M., Dear, B. F., Reynolds, J., Lowinger, J., Thornton, L., & Gorman, P. (2019). Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems. Digit Health., 5, 2055207619878069.

5. Booker, Q. S., Austin, J. D., & Balasubramanian, B. A. (2021). Survey strategies to increase participant response rates in primary care research studies. Family Practice, 38(5), 699–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab070

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3