Author:
Waaijer Marijn,Van Neerven Jan
Abstract
AbstractIn this article, we present a detailed analysis of two famous delayed choice experiments: Wheeler’s classic gedanken-experiment and the delayed quantum eraser. Our analysis shows that the outcomes of both experiments can be fully explained on the basis of the information collected during the experiments using textbook quantum mechanics only. At no point in the argument, information from the future is needed to explain what happens next. In fact, more is true: for both experiments, we show, in a strictly mathematical way, that a modified version in which the time-ordering of the steps is changed to avoid the delayed choice leads to exactly the same final state. In this operational sense, the scenarios are completely equivalent in terms of conclusions that can be drawn from their outcomes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Dieguez, P.R., Guimarães, J.R., Peterson, J.P., Angelo, R.M., Serra, R.M.: Experimental assessment of physical realism in a quantum-controlled device. Commun. Phys. 5(1), 82 (2022)
2. Donker, H.C., De Raedt, H., Michielsen, K.: Event-by-event simulation of a quantum delayed-choice experiment. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185(12), 3109–3118 (2014)
3. Faye, J.: Backward Causation. Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2021). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/causation-backwards/
4. Frauchiger, D., Renner, R.: Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 3711 (2018)
5. Friederich, S., Evans, P.W.: Retrocausality in Quantum Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2023). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/qm-retrocausality/