Author:
Schwab Peter K.,Röckl Jonas,Langohr Maximilian S.,Meyer-Wegener Klaus
Abstract
AbstractData science must respect privacy in many situations. We have built a query repository with automatic SQL query classification according to data-privacy directives. It can intercept queries that violate the directives, since a JDBC proxy driver inserted between the end-users’ SQL tooling and the target data consults the repository for the compliance of each query. Still, this slows down query processing. This paper presents two optimizations implemented to increase classification performance and describes a measurement environment that allows quantifying the induced performance overhead. We present measurement results and show that our optimized implementation significantly reduces classification latency. The query metadata (QM) is stored in both relational and graph-based databases. Whereas query classification can be done in a few ms on average using relational QM, a graph-based classification is orders of magnitude more expensive at 137 ms on average. However, the graphs contain more precise information, and thus in some cases the final decision requires to check them, too. Our optimizations considerably reduce the number of graph-based classifications and, thus, decrease the latency to 0.35 ms in $$87\%$$
87
%
of the classification cases.
Funder
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Adam et al (1989) Security-control methods for statistical databases: a comparative study. ACM Comput Surv 21(4):515–556
2. Biswas et al (2011) Transforming privacy policies to auditing specifications. In: 13th Int. Symposium HASE. IEEE, Boca Raton, pp 368–375
3. Danaparamita et al (2011) Queryviz: helping users understand SQL queries and their patterns. In: 14th Int. Conf. EDBT Uppsala, pp 558–561
4. Dong et al (2005) Malleable schemas: a preliminary report. In: 8th Int. Workshop WebDB Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pp 139–144
5. Fabbri et al (2013) SELECT triggers for data auditing. In: ICDE Brisbane, pp 1141–1152
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献