Precision nitrogen management in rainfed durum wheat cultivation: exploring synergies and trade-offs via energy analysis, life cycle assessment, and monetization
-
Published:2023-08-10
Issue:6
Volume:24
Page:2566-2591
-
ISSN:1385-2256
-
Container-title:Precision Agriculture
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Precision Agric
Author:
Denora Michele, Candido Vincenzo, D’Antonio Paola, Perniola Michele, Mehmeti AndiORCID
Abstract
AbstractFertilization with variable rate technology (VRT) is a pivotal technique of precision agriculture proposed for eco-friendly farming practices. Yet the magnitude of environmental benefits is often not well known or is highly variable. This study used a multi-indicator model and life cycle-based indicators to compare the performance of rain-fed durum wheat production using uniform (UA) and variable N fertilization (VRT). Two functional units were used: 1 ha of cultivated wheat and 1 ton of wheat produced. The energy analysis indicated that VRT increases energy use efficiency and productivity by 13.3%, reduces specific energy and total energy input by 11.7%, and increases net energy gain by 15.3%. The life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis indicated that for some environmental impacts, VRT had minor negative effects due to the comparable yield performance with UA. Yet, the VRT had a noteworthy positive impact on global warming, fine particulate matter formation, stratospheric ozone depletion, terrestrial acidification, and marine eutrophication, generating a final environmental benefit of 12.2% for 1 ton of product and 13.3% for 1 ha of land. Economic valuation or monetization of LCA results using monetization weighting factors indicated indirect economic benefits of VRT can be up to 6.6% for 1 ton of product and 7.7% for 1 ha of land. Our findings support the use of nitrogen fertilization with VRT for sustainable extensification and improved eco-efficiency of wheat production in a Mediterranean context. As a result of our research, we conclude that future case studies on annual crops with moderate land requirements should employ multiple metrics and functional units, as well as the concepts of monetization and life cycle assessment, to investigate trade-offs between yield, economic, and environmental benefits and to aid decision-making about the true sustainability of proposed farming technologies.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Regione Basilicata Università degli Studi della Basilicata
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference51 articles.
1. Ashworth, A. J., Putman, W. B., Kharel, T., Thoma, G., Shew, A., Popp, M., & Owens, P. (2022). Environmental impact assessment of tractor guidance systems based on pasture management scenarios. Journal of the ASABE, 65(3), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.14930 2. Bacenetti, J., Paleari, L., Tartarini, S., Vesely, F. M., Foi, M., Movedi, E., et al. (2020). May smart technologies reduce the environmental impact of nitrogen fertilization? A case study for paddy rice. Science of the Total Environment, 715, 136956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136956 3. Balafoutis, A., Koundouras, S., Anastasiou, E., Fountas, S., & Arvanitis, K. (2017). Life cycle assessment of two vineyards after the application of precision viticulture techniques: A case study. Sustainability, 9(11), 1997. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111997 4. Basso, B., Dumont, B., Cammarano, D., Pezzuolo, A., Marinello, F., & Sartori, L. (2016). Environmental and economic benefits of variable rate nitrogen fertilization in a nitrate vulnerable zone. Science of the Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.104 5. Bux, C., Lombardi, M., Varese, E., & Amicarelli, V. (2022). Economic and environmental assessment of conventional versus organic durum wheat production in Southern Italy. Sustainability (switzerland), 14(15), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159143
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|