Abstract
AbstractLeaf area index (LAI) is a key variable in understanding and modeling crop-environment interactions. With the advent of increasingly higher spatial resolution satellites and sensors mounted on remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs), the use of remote sensing in precision agriculture is becoming more common. Since also the availability of methods to retrieve LAI from image data have also drastically expanded, it is necessary to test simultaneously as many methods as possible to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Ground-based LAI data from three years of barley experiments were related to remote sensing information using vegetation indices (VI), machine learning (ML) and radiative transfer models (RTM), to assess the relative accuracy and efficacy of these methods. The optimized soil adjusted vegetation index and a modified version of the Weighted Difference Vegetation Index performed slightly better than any other retrieval method. However, all methods yielded coefficients of determination of around 0.7 to 0.9. The best performing machine learning algorithms achieved higher accuracies when four Sentinel-2 bands instead of 12 were used. Also, the good performance of VIs and the satisfactory performance of the 4-band RTM, strongly support the synergistic use of satellites and RPAs in precision agriculture. One of the methods used, Sen2-Agri, an open source ML-RTM-based operational system, was also able to accurately retrieve LAI, although it is restricted to Sentinel-2 and Landsat data. This study shows the benefits of testing simultaneously a broad range of retrieval methods to monitor crops for precision agriculture.
Funder
EIT Climate-KIC
Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference61 articles.
1. Abrahamsen, P., & Hansen, S. (2000). Daisy: An open soil-crop-atmosphere system model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15, 313.
2. Asam, S. (2014). Potential of high resolution remote sensing data for leaf area index derivation using statistical and physical models. Würzburg University.
3. Berger, K., Atzberger, C., Danner, M., D’Urso, G., Mauser, W., Vuolo, F., et al. (2018). Evaluation of the PROSAIL model capabilities for future hyperspectral model environments: A review study. Remote Sensing, 10(1), 85.
4. Boegh, E., Houborg, R., Bienkowski, J., Braban, C. F., Dalgaard, T., van Dijk, N., et al. (2013). Remote sensing of LAI, chlorophyll and leaf nitrogen pools of crop- and grasslands in five European landscapes. Biogeosciences, 10(10), 6279–6307. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6279-2013
5. Bréda, N.J.J. (2003). Ground‐based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54(392), 2403–2417. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg263
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献