Physician self-reported knowledge of and barriers to indication of alternative therapies for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Author:

Braun M,Stuck BA

Abstract

Abstract Background Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease with significant implications for individual physical and mental wellbeing. Though in theory, OSA can be effectively treated with positive airway pressure therapy (PAP), many patients cannot adhere chronically and require alternative treatment. With sleep physicians being relevant stakeholders in the process of allocation of OSA treatments, this research aims to study their knowledge and perceptions of alternative therapies available in routine care in Germany. Methods This work is part of a larger research project which aims to assess the state of sleep medical care in Germany. Items relevant to this study included self-reported knowledge, indication volumes, and perceptions of five alternative treatments for OSA, which are available for routine care in Germany. Results A total of 435 sleep physicians from multiple medical disciplines and both care sectors participated in the study. Self-reported knowledge on alternative OSA treatments was moderate and correlated with the consultation volume. Self-reported adoption of alternative therapies was higher in nonsurgical methods, and only 1.1% of participants reported not utilizing any of the alternative treatments. The most relevant perceived barriers to indication were “reimbursement issues” for mandibular advancement devices and positional therapy; “evidence insufficient” for upper airway surgery, and “no demand from patients” for hypoglossal nerve stimulation and maxillomandibular Advancement. Conclusion Self-reported knowledge of alternative OSA treatments is moderate and indication of alternative OSA therapies varies substantially. Sleep physicians often perceive barriers that limit provision or referrals for provision of these treatments. Additional research is required to further understand barriers and factors influencing creation of those perceptions and decision-making among physicians.

Funder

Universitätsklinikum Essen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3