1. Barros, B., & Verdejo, F. M. (2000). Analyzing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11(3), 221–241. http://ijaied.org/pub/1004/file/1004_paper.pdf .
2. Bézivin, J., & Gerbé, O. (2001). Towards a precise definition of the OMG/MDA framework. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, IEEE (pp. 273–280). San Diego, USA. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6586/b19c6edf8850ac97fffb4ea6f65144200b1b.pdf .
3. Bratitsis, T., & Dimitracopoulou, A. (2009). Studying the effect of interaction analysis indicators on students’ selfregulation during asynchronous discussion learning activities. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 601–605). Greece. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221033728_Studying_the_effect_of_Interaction_Analysis_indicators_on_student’s_Selfregulation_during_asynchronous_discussion_learning_activities .
4. Butoianu, V., Vidal, P., & Broisin, J. (2012). A model-driven approach to actively manage TEL indicators. In T. Amiel, & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1757–1765). Denver, Colorado, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230675845_A_Model-driven_Approach_to_Actively_Manage_TEL_Indicators .
5. Champalle, O., Sehaba, K., & Mille, A. (2013). Capitalize and share observation and analysis knowledge to assist trainers in professional training with simulation case of training and skills maintain of nuclear power plant control room staff. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 627–632). Aachen, Germany. http://liris.cnrs.fr/Documents/Liris-6056.pdf .