Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, there have been reports of the deactivation of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) exhaust gas catalysts after a short period of operation in marine applications. The trigger and the processes of this catalyst damage have now been investigated experimentally using a fuel burner test bench and various analysis techniques. It was found that organic silicon compounds (OSCs), which are present in marine fuels after use in mineral oil extraction and processing, cause the catalyst deactivation. In practice, these are predominantly dimethylsiloxanes. By the burner experiments, it was found that the OSCs were completely converted into combustion products, in particular SiO2. Measurements of particle size distributions and particle number concentrations up- and downstream of the catalyst showed that SiO2 particles < 20 nm in particular were retained in the catalyst. This filtration effect decreased until no further reduction was observed for particles > 50 nm. Other inorganic, particulate, SiO2-containing fuel impurities (catalyst fines) had no poisoning effect here, as these particles are mostly > 50 nm. The small particles formed a closed SiO2 layer with a thickness of approx. 5 µm on the catalyst surface which grew from the catalyst inlet to the outlet and blocked the catalyst as a diffusion barrier. As the SiO2 layer increased, the NO conversion rate decreased. The poisoning effects were observed experimentally at OSC concentrations of 5 to 60 mg Si kg−1 fuel. A field-aged catalyst that had been operated on board of a merchant ship revealed the same findings.
Funder
Research Association for Combustion Engines eV
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. IMO, International Maritime Organization: Annex 12. Resolution MEPC.251(66). Adopted on 4. April 2014. Amendments to MARPOL Annex VI and the NOx Technical Code 2008. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/MEPC-1-Circ-251.pdf (2014). Accessed 13 February 2024
2. IMO, International Maritime Organization: Consistent implementation of MARPOL ANNEX VI, 2019 Edition, IMO Publishing, London (2019). https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/publications/Documents/Flyers/Flyers/I666E.pdf (2020). Accessed 24 July 2024
3. Focus.: Marine fuels: price impact of new 2020 low sulfur regulations negated by refineries and Covid-19. Oil Energy Trends (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/oet.12808
4. Gandhi, H.S., Williamson, W.B., Goss, R.L., Marcotty, L.A., Lewis, D.: Silicon contamination of automotive catalysts. SAE Technical Paper (1986). https://doi.org/10.4271/860565
5. Rokosz, M.J., Chen, A.E., Lowe-Ma, C.K., Kucherov, A.V., Benson, D., Paputa Peck, M.C., McCabe, R.W.: Characterization of phosphorus-poisoned automotive exhaust catalysts. Appl. Catal. B 33, 205–215 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00165-5