Author:
Špička Petr,Chudáček Josef,Řezáč Tomáš,Vomáčková Katherine,Ambrož Radek,Molnár Ján,Klos Dušan,Vrba Radek
Abstract
Summary
Background
Diffuse peritonitis is a severe disease with high mortality and morbidity rates. Therapy is fundamentally surgical. It is important to identify patients with a significantly worse prognosis and patients who may benefit from more aggressive surgical and postsurgical care such as NPWT (Narrow Pressure Wound Therapy) prior to surgery. We tried to identify a determining factor for higher morbidity and mortality rates resulting in a worse prognosis among initial data and patient comorbidities in order to focus therapy towards more aggressive surgical management.
Methods
In a group of 274 patients with diffuse peritonitis, we evaluated the type of peritonitis according to effusion, origin, surgery type, and the age, gender, and present comorbidities of the patients, and compared it with the overall mortality, morbidity rate, and duration of hospitalization.
Results
Patients without comorbidities had a significantly lower burden in both morbidity and mortality. We recorded the highest difference in mortality in patients with two or more comorbidities, with pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases, with malignancy and hypertension. Morbidity was found to be significantly exacerbated by the presence of two or more severe diseases, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and hypertension.
Conclusion
We identified age, effusion type, and the presence of comorbidities as key factors for the prognosis of our patients—the morbidity and mortality rates were substantially increased in patients with two or more comorbidities, as well as by the presence of cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and hypertension. A more aggressive approach should be considered to improve the prognosis in these patients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Špička P, Gryga A, Malý T, Neoral Č. Current management of diffuse peritonitis—is postoperative continuous lavage still a relevant method of choice? Rozhl Chir. 2019;98(1):18–22.
2. Špička P, Chudáček J, Řezáč T, Starý L, Horáček R, Klos D. Prognostic significance of simple scoring systems in the prediction of diffuse peritonitis morbidity and mortality. Life. 2022;12(4):487. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12040487.
3. Schwarz A, Bölke E, Peiper M, Schulte am Esch J, Steinbach G, van Griensven M, Orth K. Inflammatory peritoneal reaction after perforated appendicitis: continuous peritoneal lavage versus non lavage. Eur J Med Res. 2007;12(5):200–5.
4. Winkeltau G, Winkeltau GU, Klosterhalfen B, Niemann H, Treutner KH, Schumpelick V. Differenzierte chirurgische Therapie der diffusen Peritonitis [Differential surgical therapy in diffuse peritonitis. Chirurg. 1992;63(12):1035–40.
5. Bleszynski MS, Chan T, Buczkowski AK. Open abdomen with negative pressure device vs primary abdominal closure for the management of surgical abdominal sepsis: a retrospective review. Am J Surg. 2016;211(5):926–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.012.