1. Gerber K H and Higgins C B. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on coronary and peripheral blood flow. Invest Radiol, 17:292–298, 1982.
2. Schraeder R, Baller D, Hoeft A, Korb H, Wolpers H G, and Heilige G. Reduced side effects of low osmolality nonionic contrast media in coronary arteriography. In V Taenzer and E Zeitler, editors, Contrast media in urography,angiography and computerized tomography, pages 67–77. George Thieme Verlag, Stutgart, New York, 1983.
3. Simon R, Koch M, Hermann G, Amende I, and Lichtlen P R. Direct effects of an ionic nonionic contrast agent on the coronary circulation in man. In Proceedings Xth World Congress Cardiology, page 294. Washington, 1986.
4. Wilson R F, Laughlin D E, Ackell P H, Chilian W M, Holida M D, Hartley C J, Armstrong M L, Marcus M L, and White C W. Transluminal subselective measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity and vasodilator reserve in man. Circulation,72:82–92, 1985.
5. Pijls N H J, Bos H S, Uijen G J H, and Van der Werf T. Is ionic isotonic iohexol the contrast agent of choice for quantitative myocardial videodensitometry? Intern J Cardiac Imag, 3:117–126, 1988.