Empiricism Without Metaphysics: Regius’ Cartesian Natural Philosophy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Empiricism Without Metaphysics: Regius’ Cartesian Natural Philosophy

Published:2013 Issue: Volume: Page:151-183
ISSN:0929-6425
Container-title:Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Bellis Delphine

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-007-7690-6_7

Reference48 articles.

1. Bellis, Delphine. 2010. Le visible et l’invisible dans la pensée cartésienne: figuration, imagination et vision dans la philosophie naturelle de René Descartes. PhD dissertation, Université Paris-Sorbonne, Paris; Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.

2. Bitbol-Hespéries, Annie. 1993. Descartes et Regius: leur pensée médicale. In Descartes et Regius. Autour de l’Explication de l’esprit humain, ed. Theo Verbeek, 47–68. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.

3. Bos, Erik-Jan (ed.). 2002. The correspondence between Descartes and Henricus Regius. PhD dissertation, Quaestiones Infinitae, Utrecht.

4. Bos, Erik-Jan. 2013. Henricus Regius et les limites de la philosophie cartésienne. In Qu’est-ce qu’être cartésien? ed. Delphine Kolesnik-Antoine, 53–68. Lyon: ENS Editions.

5. Bouillier, Francisque. 1868. Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne, 3rd ed. Paris: Delagrave.

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Use and Plagiarism of Descartes’s Traité de l’homme by Henricus Regius: A Reassessment;Perspectives on Science;2023

2. Knowledge and Causality;Descartes in Context;2022-10-23

3. The Return of Campanella;Descartes in Context;2022-10-23

4. Quod nescis quomodo fiat id non facis;Descartes in Context;2022-10-23

5. Animals and Clocks;Descartes in Context;2022-10-23