A History of Psychology’s Complicated Relationship to Feminism: Theorizing Difference-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A History of Psychology’s Complicated Relationship to Feminism: Theorizing Difference

Published:2016 Issue: Volume: Page:167-185
ISSN:
Container-title:Centrality of History for Theory Construction in Psychology
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Radtke H. Lorraine,Stam Henderikus J.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-42760-7_9

Reference70 articles.

1. Anderson, E. (2015). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Downloaded from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/feminism-epistemology/ .

2. Bleier, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

3. Baumeister, R. F. (1988). Should we stop studying sex differences altogether? American Psychologist, 43(12), 1092–1095.

4. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

5. Bluhm, R., et al. (Eds.). (2012). Neurofeminism: Issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive science. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Empowered Women and Political Leadership;Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership;2024-05-28

2. From “Gender Difference” to “Doing Gender” to “Gender and Structural Power” in Psychological Science;Gender, Considered;2020

3. Contextualizing a Life in Science: Janet Taylor Spence and the History of Women and Gender in American Psychology;Sex Roles;2017-09-25