A Conceptual Foundation for Assessing and Managing Risk, Surprises and Black Swans-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Conceptual Foundation for Assessing and Managing Risk, Surprises and Black Swans

Published:2017 Issue: Volume: Page:23-39
ISSN:2191-530X
Container-title:The Illusion of Risk Control
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Aven Terje

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-32939-0_3

Reference66 articles.

1. Althaus CE (2005) A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Anal 25(3):567–588

2. Aven T (2000) Risk analysis — a tool for expressing and communicating uncertainty. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2000, Balkema Publishers, Edinburgh, 21–28

3. Aven T (2009) Safety is the antonym of risk for some perspectives of risk. Saf Sci 47(7):925–930

4. Aven T (2011) On some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability, and resilience. Risk Anal 31(4):515–522

5. Aven T (2012) The risk concept — historical and recent development trends. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:33–44

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Risk and uncertainty: what it means for the Dutch energy transition and how a tolerability of risk approach could help;Journal of Risk Research;2024-06-08

2. Addressing the complexity of disaster risk management: analysis of Natech events in the context of climate change;2024

3. The Ability to Reduce a Natural Hazard’s Impact and Its Perception;Of Risks and Normative Responses;2023

4. A survey comparative analysis of cartesian and complexity science frameworks adoption in financial risk management of Zimbabwean banks;Quantitative Finance and Economics;2022

5. Developing a vulnerability-based conceptual model for managing risk in non-profit projects: a multicase study in a European country;Public Management Review;2021-08-31