1. Garssen. B. J. (1997). Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek [Argument schemes in a pragma-dialectical perspective. A theoretical and empirical study]. Amsterdam: IFOTT. Doctoral dissertation University of Amsterdam.
2. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1997). Analysing complex argumentation. The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
3. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2005). What’s in a name? The use of the stylistic device metonymy as a strategic manoeuvre in the confrontation and argumentation stages of a discussion. In D. L. Hitchcock (Ed.), The uses of argument. Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University 18–21 May 2005 (pp. 433–441). Hamilton: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
4. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2009a). Manoeuvring strategically with rhetorical questions. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.). Pondering on problems of argumentation. Twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 15–23). Dordrecht etc.: Springer. Argumentation Library 14.
5. Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2009b). The contribution of praeteritio to arguers’ confrontational strategic manoeuvres. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Examining argumentation in context. Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering (pp. 241–255). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 1.