Automatically Detecting Fallacies in System Safety Arguments-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Automatically Detecting Fallacies in System Safety Arguments

Published:2016 Issue: Volume: Page:47-59
ISSN:0302-9743
Container-title:Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Yuan Tangming,Manandhar Suresh,Kelly Tim,Wells Simon

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-46218-9_4

Reference25 articles.

1. UK Ministry of Defence: Defence standard 00-55 the procurement of safety critical software in defence equipment (1997). http://www.dstan.mod.uk/ . Accessed 20 May 2011

2. International Electrotechnical Commission: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems (IEC 61508 ed2.0) (2010). http://www.iec.ch/ . Accessed 20 May 2011

3. Bishop, P.G., Bloomfield, R.E.: A methodology for safety case development. In: Safety-Critical Systems Symposium (SSS 1998) (1998)

4. Leveson, N.: The use of safety cases in certification and regulation. J. Syst. Safety 47(6), 1–5 (2011)

5. Kelly, T.P.: Reviewing assurance arguments a step-by-step approach. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Assurance Cases for Security: The Metrics Challenge, Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), Edinburgh (2007)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A PRISMA-driven systematic mapping study on system assurance weakeners;Information and Software Technology;2024-11

2. Assessing the Impact of GPT-4 Turbo in Generating Defeaters for Assurance Cases;Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM First International Conference on AI Foundation Models and Software Engineering;2024-04-14

3. Assessing Arguments with Schemes and Fallacies;Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning;2019