1. Cohen, Bernard L. (1985) “Criteria for Technology Acceptability,” Risk Analysis, 5(1), 1–3.
2. Chen, Yongjie and Wang Hao. (2011). “PX daodi you duo du” [How toxic is PX?], Beijing kejibao [Beijing science and technology news], (11 August), 16.
3. Dieter, Birnbacher. (2009). “Deguo dui de taidu – shengwu yixue zhong falv yu lunli guanxi de yige dianxing anli [The Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine of the Council of Europe in Germany – A Case History in the Relation of Law and Ethics in Biomedicine].” In Wang Guoyu and Liu Zeyuan, eds., Kexue jishu lunli de kuawenhua duihua [Cross-cultural dialogue on the ethics of science and technology] (Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe [Science Press Ltd.]), 81–96.
4. Hubig, C. (1997). Technologische Kultur. Leibzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
5. Thompson, Paul B. (2001). “Social Acceptance of Nanotechnology.” In Mihail C. Roco and William S. Bainbridge, eds., Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (Arlington, Virginia: NSET Workshop Report), 251–252.