Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference10 articles.
1. Aust, U., & Huber, L. (2006). Does the use of natural stimuli facilitate amodal completion in pigeons? Perception, 35, 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5233.
2. Baum, T., Katsman, I., Rivlin, E., Broza, M., Moshkovich, M., & Katzir, G. (2014). Response of the praying mantis, Sphodromantis viridis, to target change in size and to target visual occlusion. Journal of Insect Behavior, 27, 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-013-9422-4.
3. Cavoto, B. R., & Cook, R. G. (2006). The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons. Psychological Science, 17, 628–634.
4. Deruelle, C., Barbet, I., Depy, I., & Fagot, J. (2000). Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio). Perception, 29, 1483–1497.
5. Fujita, K. (2006). Seeing what is not there: Illusion, completion, and spatiotemporal boundary formation in comparative perspective. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative Cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 29–52). New York: Oxford University Press.