Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles

Published:2017 Issue: Volume: Page:73-99
ISSN:2509-6745
Container-title:Scientific Scholarly Communication
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

De Silva Pali U. K.,K. Vance Candace

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_6

Reference112 articles.

1. Alberts, B., Hanson, B., & Kelner, K. L. (2008). Reviewing peer review. Science, 321(5885), 15.

2. Ali, P. A., & Watson, R. (2016). Peer review and the publication process. Nursing Open. doi: 10.1002/nop2.51 .

3. Baggs, J. G., Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M. C., Freda, M. C., & Kearney, M. H. (2008). Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(2), 131–138.

4. Bjork, B.-C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2009). Scientific journal publishing: yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 14(1).

5. Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review. Science, 342(6154).

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Public engagement with COVID-19 preprints: Bridging the gap between scientists and society;Quantitative Science Studies;2024

2. Enhancing the examination of obstacles in an automated peer review system;International Journal on Digital Libraries;2023-12-02

3. Editor home bias?;Research Policy;2023-07

4. Review Policy Moderates the Correlation Between CiteScore and JIF For BMC Journals;Journal of Scholarly Publishing;2022-10-01

5. Between acceptance and rejection;Proceedings of the 22nd ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries;2022-06-20