Treatment strategies to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer
-
Published:2020-03-12
Issue:7
Volume:196
Page:589-597
-
ISSN:0179-7158
-
Container-title:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Strahlenther Onkol
Author:
Ghadjar Pirus, ,Aebersold Daniel M.,Albrecht Clemens,Böhmer Dirk,Flentje Michael,Ganswindt Ute,Höcht Stefan,Hölscher Tobias,Müller Arndt-Christian,Niehoff Peter,Pinkawa Michael,Sedlmayer Felix,Zips Daniel,Wiegel Thomas
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
To provide an overview on the available treatments to prevent and reduce gynecomastia and/or breast pain caused by antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer.
Methods
The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel summarized available evidence published and assessed the validity of the information on efficacy and treatment-related toxicity.
Results
Eight randomized controlled trials and one meta-analysis were identified. Two randomized trials demonstrated that prophylactic radiation therapy (RT) using 1 × 10 Gy or 2 × 6 Gy significantly reduced the rate of gynecomastia but not breast pain, as compared to observation. A randomized dose-finding trial identified the daily dose of 20 mg tamoxifen (TMX) as the most effective prophylactic dose and another randomized trial described that daily TMX use was superior to weekly use. Another randomized trial showed that prophylactic daily TMX is more effective than TMX given at the onset of gynecomastia. Two other randomized trials described that TMX was clearly superior to anastrozole in reducing the risk for gynecomastia and/or breast pain. One comparative randomized trial between prophylactic RT using 1 × 12 Gy and TMX concluded that prophylactic TMX is more effective compared to prophylactic RT and furthermore that TMX appears to be more effective to treat gynecomastia and/or breast pain when symptoms are already present. A meta-analysis confirmed that both prophylactic RT and TMX can reduce the risk of gynecomastia and/or breast pain with TMX being more effective; however, the rate of side effects after TMX including dizziness and hot flushes might be higher than after RT and must be taken into account. Less is known regarding the comparative effectiveness of different radiation fractionation schedules and more modern RT techniques.
Conclusions
Prophylactic RT as well as daily TMX can significantly reduce the incidence of gynecomastia and/or breast pain. TMX appears to be an effective alternative to RT also as a therapeutic treatment in the presence of gynecomastia but its side effects and off-label use must be considered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Oncology,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference26 articles.
1. Nguyen PL, Alibhai SM, Basaria S, D’Amico AV, Kantoff PW, Keating NL, Penson DF, Rosario DJ, Tombal B, Smith MR (2015) Adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy and strategies to mitigate them. Eur Urol 67:825–836 2. Ghadjar P, Aebersold DM, Albrecht C, Böhmer D, Flentje M, Ganswindt U, Höcht S, Hölscher T, Müller AC, Niehoff P, Pinkawa M, Sedlmayer F, Zips D, Wiegel T (2020) Intermediate-risk prostate cancer—role of the combined radiation- and androgen deprivation therapy: Statement from the DEGRO working group prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-019-01553-3 3. Ghadjar P, Aebersold DM, Albrecht C, Böhmer D, Flentje M, Ganswindt U, Höcht S, Hölscher T, Sedlmayer F, Wenz F, Zips D, Wiegel T, Prostate Cancer Expert Panel of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO), Working Party Radiation Oncology of the German Cancer Society (DKG-ARO) (2018) Use of androgen deprivation and salvage radiation therapy for patients with prostate cancer and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. Strahlenther Onkol 194:619–626 4. Fagerlund A, Cormio L, Palangi L, Lewin R, Santanelli di Pompeo F, Elander A, Selvaggi G (2015) Gynecomastia in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 10:e136094 5. Tombal B, Borre M, Rathenborg P, Werbrouck P, Van Poppel H, Heidenreich A, Iversen P, Braeckman J, Heracek J, Baskin-Bey E, Ouatas T, Perabo F, Phung D, Baron B, Hirmand M, Smith MR (2015) Long-term efficacy and safety of enzalutamide monotherapy in hormone-naïve prostate cancer: 1‑ and 2‑year open-label follow-up results. Eur Urol 68:787–794
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|