Dose prescription for stereotactic body radiotherapy: general and organ-specific consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery

Author:

Brunner Thomas B.ORCID,Boda-Heggemann Judit,Bürgy Daniel,Corradini Stefanie,Dieckmann Ute Karin,Gawish Ahmed,Gerum Sabine,Gkika Eleni,Grohmann Maximilian,Hörner-Rieber Juliane,Kirste Simon,Klement Rainer J.,Moustakis Christos,Nestle Ursula,Niyazi Maximilian,Rühle Alexander,Lang Stephanie-Tanadini,Winkler Peter,Zurl Brigitte,Wittig-Sauerwein Andrea,Blanck Oliver

Abstract

Abstract Purpose and objective To develop expert consensus statements on multiparametric dose prescriptions for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) aligning with ICRU report 91. These statements serve as a foundational step towards harmonizing current SBRT practices and refining dose prescription and documentation requirements for clinical trial designs. Materials and methods Based on the results of a literature review by the working group, a two-tier Delphi consensus process was conducted among 24 physicians and physics experts from three European countries. The degree of consensus was predefined for overarching (OA) and organ-specific (OS) statements (≥ 80%, 60–79%, < 60% for high, intermediate, and poor consensus, respectively). Post-first round statements were refined in a live discussion for the second round of the Delphi process. Results Experts consented on a total of 14 OA and 17 OS statements regarding SBRT of primary and secondary lung, liver, pancreatic, adrenal, and kidney tumors regarding dose prescription, target coverage, and organ at risk dose limitations. Degree of consent was ≥ 80% in 79% and 41% of OA and OS statements, respectively, with higher consensus for lung compared to the upper abdomen. In round 2, the degree of consent was ≥ 80 to 100% for OA and 88% in OS statements. No consensus was reached for dose escalation to liver metastases after chemotherapy (47%) or single-fraction SBRT for kidney primaries (13%). In round 2, no statement had 60–79% consensus. Conclusion In 29 of 31 statements a high consensus was achieved after a two-tier Delphi process and one statement (kidney) was clearly refused. The Delphi process was able to achieve a high degree of consensus for SBRT dose prescription. In summary, clear recommendations for both OA and OS could be defined. This contributes significantly to harmonization of SBRT practice and facilitates dose prescription and reporting in clinical trials investigating SBRT.

Funder

Medical University of Graz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference97 articles.

1. ICRU Report 91, Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting of Stereotactic Treatments with Small Photon Beams. In;L Seuntjens,2017

2. Wilke L, Andratschke N, Blanck O, Brunner TB, Combs SE, Grosu AL, Moustakis C, Schmitt D, Baus WW, Guckenberger M (2019) ICRU report 91 on prescribing, recording, and reporting of stereotactic treatments with small photon beams: Statement from the DEGRO/DGMP working group stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al] 195(3):193–198

3. Guckenberger M, Baus WW, Blanck O, Combs SE, Debus J, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Gauer T, Grosu AL, Schmitt D, Tanadini-Lang S et al (2020) Definition and quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al] 196(5):417–420

4. Schmitt D, Blanck O, Gauer T, Fix MK, Brunner TB, Fleckenstein J, Loutfi-Krauss B, Manser P, Werner R, Wilhelm ML et al (2020) Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy: Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft [et al] 196(5):421–443

5. Brunner T (2022) A story of hypofractionation and the “Table on the Wall”]. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie: Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft. Et Al 198(8):759–760

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3