Abstract
AbstractA stylised fact in regional and urban studies of life satisfaction in developed countries is that people living in cities report being less satisfied than those in rural areas. Building upon the theoretical framework of Sen’s capability approach, along with research on life satisfaction and amenities, this paper examines the role of amenity availability and accessibility, as well as social relations, in shaping life satisfaction. Using data from the 2013–2018 household survey conducted by the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) in Italian regions at the NUTS2 level, this study explores the role of availability and accessibility of amenities and social relations on urban–rural life satisfaction. Results suggest that the likelihood of having higher life satisfaction is associated with living in wealthier rural places where higher-ranked cities exert accessibility and positive externalities in line with the borrowed size concept by Alonso (Daedalus 102(4):191–206, 1973).
Funder
Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2020
Fondazione di Sardegna
Università degli Studi di Sassari
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference75 articles.
1. Albouy D (2016) What are cities worth? Land rents, local productivity, and the total value of amenities. Rev Econ Stat 98(3):477–487
2. Albouy D, Graf W, Kellogg R, Wolff H (2016) Climate amenities, climate change, and American quality of life. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 3(1):205–246
3. Alesina A, Di Tella R, MacCulloch R (2004) Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? J Public Econ 88:2009–2042
4. Alonso W (1973) Urban zero population growth. Daedalus 102(4):191–206
5. Anand P, Krishnakumar J, Tran NB (2011) Measuring welfare: latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity. J Public Econ 95:205–215