Celebrating Differences: A Conjoint Analysis of Senior Year Mechanical Engineering Students’ Occupational Preferences

Author:

Magarian James N.ORCID,Seering Warren P.

Abstract

AbstractGiven its ongoing struggles at attaining demographic diversity and its key role in nations’ economies, the engineering workforce receives considerable attention from researchers and policymakers. Yet, prior studies and STEM recruitment initiatives have often underemphasized the variety among available engineering jobs and careers. It therefore remains unclear which attributes of engineering work are most salient in shaping students’ choices to persist in or depart from engineering pathways. This study introduces a novel conjoint survey experiment conducted with over 1000 senior year mechanical engineering students. This randomized experiment allows the authors to disentangle supply-side and demand-side factors to assess engineering job attributes’ marginal influences on students’ occupational preferences, as well as to examine these attributes’ interaction effects with supply-side factors. Toward strengthening persistence in engineering pathways, findings suggest that broad STEM recruitment initiatives, though potentially advantageous in pre-college years, should give way to more targeted campaigns that increase university students’ awareness about key dimensions of variety across engineering work roles.

Funder

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference126 articles.

1. Allen, T. J., & Katz, R. (1995). The project-oriented engineer: A dilemma for human resource management. R&D Management, 25(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1995.tb00906.x

2. Alpers, B. (2010). Studies on the mathematical expertise of mechanical engineers. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(3), 2–17.

3. Amelink, C. T., & Creamer, E. G. (2010). Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01044.x

4. American Society for Engineering Education. (2013). Transforming undergraduate engineering education—Phase I: synthesizing and integrating industry perspectives. American Society for Engineering Education Workshop Report, Atlanta, GA. https://www.asee.org/TUEE_PhaseI_WorkshopReport.pdf

5. Amir, O., & Lobel, O. (2013). Driving performance: A growth theory of noncompete law. Stanford Technology Law Review, 16, 833.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3