Pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders: an update to a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Published:2021-02-15
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1573-3750
-
Container-title:Journal of Experimental Criminology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Exp Criminol
Author:
Glanville J. M., Perry A. E.ORCID, James M. Martyn-St, Hewitt C., Swami S., Wright K., Burns L., Pearson C., Aboaja A., Thakkar P., Kumar K. M. S., Bunney M.
Abstract
Abstract
This updated systematic review assesses the effects of pharmacological interventions for drug-using offenders.
Methods
Systematic review protocols and conventions of the Cochrane Collaboration were followed to identify eligible studies. Studies were pooled in a meta-analysis to assess the impact of pharmacological interventions on drug use and criminal activity. An economic appraisal was conducted.
Results
The search strategies identified 22 studies containing 4372 participants. Meta-analyses revealed a small statistically significant mean difference favouring pharmacological interventions relative to psychological interventions in reducing drug use and criminal activity. When comparing the drugs to one another there were no significant differences between those included (methadone versus buprenorphine, naltrexone and cyclazocine).
Conclusion
Overall, the findings of this review suggest that methadone and naltrexone may have some impact on reducing drug use and reincarceration. Individual pharmacological drugs had differing (generally non-significant) effects. One study identified serious adverse events. Three studies reported cost and consequences information sufficient to conduct a full economic analysis but this was not comprehensive enough to be able to make judgements across all treatment options. Full economic analyses should be encouraged. The study findings were limited mainly to male adult offenders.
Funder
Michigan Department of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference75 articles.
1. Amato, L., Davoli, M., Perucci, C. A., Ferri, M., Faggiano, F., & Mattick, R. P. (2005). An overview of systematic reviews of the effectiveness of opiate maintenance therapies: available evidence to inform clinical practice and research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(4), 321–329. 2. Bayanzadeh SA. (2004) .Final report of research project: a study of the effectiveness of psychopharmacological and psychological interventions in reducing harmful/high risk behaviours among substance user prisoners. Iran University of Medical Education and Health and Treatment Services, Tehran Psychology Institute. Centre for Psychological Health Research Polarity of Science, Education and Research. 3. Binswanger, I., Stern, M., Deyo, R., Heagerty, P., Cheadle, A., Elmore, J., et al. (2007). Release from prison - a high risk of death for former inmates. New England Journal of Medicine, 356(2), 157–165. 4. Bird, S. M., & Hutchinson, S. J. (2003). Male drugs-related deaths in the fortnight after release from prison: Scotland, 1996-99. Addiction, 98(2), 185–190. 5. Brodie, J. D., Case, B. G., Figueroa, E., Dewey, S. L., Robinson, J. A., Wanderling, J. A., et al. (2009). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vigabatrin for the treatment of cocaine dependence in Mexican parolees. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(11), 1269–1277.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|