Abstract
AbstractAdsorption-based direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS) is an emerging approach to mitigate climate change by removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Recent studies show separately that thermodynamic and environmental performance strongly depend on regional ambient conditions and energy supply but neglect regional CO2 storage potentials. To assess DACCS performance holistically, a detailed global analysis is needed that accounts for the interplay of regional ambient conditions, energy supply, and CO2 storage potential. Hence, we present a novel method for the optimal siting of DACCS plants derived from optimising a dynamic process model that uses global hourly weather data and regionalised data on electricity supply and CO2 storage potential. The carbon removal rate (CRR) measures the climate benefit and describes the speed at which a DACCS plant generates net negative emissions. First, we assume that CO2 storage is possible everywhere. For four electricity supply scenarios, we show that the optimal siting of DACCS significantly increases the CRR when comparing the best and worst locations in each scenario: For a DACCS plant with a nameplate capture capacity of 4 kt CO2 y−1, the CRR can be increased by 63% from 2.16 to 3.53 kt CO2 y‑1 when using photovoltaic, and by 39% from 2.95 to 4.1 kt CO2 y‑1 when using wind power. Assuming a carbon-free electricity supply, the CRR varies between 3.17 and 4.17 kt CO2 y‑1 (32%). Second, we significantly narrow down optimal locations for DACCS considering regional CO2 storage potential through CO2 mineralisation. Overall, accounting for the interplay of regional DAC performance, energy supply, and CO2 storage potential can significantly improve DACCS siting.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C - An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty
2. Buck HJ, Carton W, Lund JF, Markusson N (2023) Why residual emissions matter right now. Nature Clim Change 13:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01592-2
3. Fawzy S, Osman AI, Doran J, Rooney DW (2020) Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18:2069–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w
4. McQueen N, Gomes KV, McCormick C, Blumanthal K, Pisciotta M, Wilcox J (2021) A review of direct air capture (DAC): scaling up commercial technologies and innovating for the future. Prog Energy 3:32001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/abf1ce
5. Bouaboula H, Chaouki J, Belmabkhout Y, Zaabout A (2024) Comparative review of Direct air capture technologies: From technical, commercial, economic, and environmental aspects. Chem Eng J 484:149411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149411