Forensic age estimation: comparison and validation of the Iscan method in 3D reconstructions using a surface scanner in a Spanish population

Author:

Beltran-Aroca Cristina M.ORCID,Lopez-Alcaraz Manuel,Perez-Jorge Pablo,Velazquez-Gomez Jose L.,Font-Ugalde Pilar,Girela-Lopez Eloy

Abstract

AbstractWhen investigating a death, post-mortem identification provides with results of great legal and humanitarian significance. The effectiveness of the methods used to estimate age depends on the reference population, considering variables such as sex and ancestry. The aim of this study was to validate the Iscan method to estimate age in a Spanish forensic population, comparing the estimates obtained in dry bones and 3D reconstructions created with a surface scanner. We carried out a cross-sectional study on 109 autopsied corpses (67% male), scanning the sternal end of the right fourth rib in a 3D mesh, using an EinScan-Pro® surface scanner (precision: 0.05 mm). Two observers estimated the phases in dry bones and 3D images according to the Iscan method and to the sex of the subject. The mean age was 57.73 years (SD = 19.12 years;18–93 years). The intra-observer agreement was almost perfect in bones (κ = 0.877–0.960) and 3D images (κ = 0.954), while the inter-observer agreement was almost perfect in bones (κ = 0.813) and substantial in 3D images (κ = 0.727). The correlation with the Iscan phases was very strong in bones (Rho = 0.794–0.820; p < 0.001) and strong in 3D images (Rho = 0.690–0.691; p < 0.001). Both sex-adjusted linear regression models were significant (dry bones: R2 = 0.65; SEE =  ± 11.264 years; 3D images: R2 = 0.50; SEE =  ± 13.537 years) from phase 4 onwards. An overestimation of age was observed in the first phases, and an underestimation in the later ones. Virtual analysis using a surface scanner in the fourth rib is a valid means of estimating age. However, the error values and confidence intervals were considerable, so the joint use of different methods and anatomical sites is recommended.

Funder

Universidad de Córdoba

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference79 articles.

1. Blau S, Graham J, Smythe L, Rowbotham S (2021) Human identification: a review of methods employed within an Australian coronial death investigation system. Int J Legal Med 135:375–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02461-3

2. Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (2010) Personal Identification. https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2018/03/13/swganth_personal_identification.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2022

3. Interpol (2018) Interpol disaster victim identification guide. Interpol working group on disaster victim identification. https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Forensics/Disaster-Victim-Identification-DVI. Accessed 18 Nov 2022

4. Ubelaker DH (1999) Human skeletal remains, excavation, analysis, interpretation. Taraxacum, Washington

5. Holobinko A (2012) Forensic human identification in the United States and Canada: a review of the law, admissible techniques, and the legal implications of their application in forensic cases. Forensic Sci Int 222:394.e1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.06.001

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3