Abstract
Abstract
Bones are one of the most common biological types of evidence in forensic cases. Discriminating human bones from irrelevant species is important for the identification of victims; however, the highly degraded bones could be undiagnostic morphologically and difficult to analyze with standard DNA profiling approaches. The same challenge also exists in archaeological studies. Here, we present an initial study of an analytical strategy that involves zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry (ZooMS) and ancient DNA methods. Through the combined strategy, we managed to identify the only biological evidence of a two-decades-old murder case — a small piece of human bone out of 19 bone fragments — and confirmed the kinship between the victim and the putative parents through joint application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and Sanger sequencing methods. ZooMS effectively screened out the target human bone while ancient DNA methods improve the DNA yields. The combined strategy in this case outperforms the standard DNA profiling approach with shorter time, less cost, as well as higher reliability for the genetic identification results.
Highlights
• The first application of zooarchaeology by mass spectrometry technique in the forensic case for screening out human bones from bone fragment mixtures.
• Application of ancient DNA technique to recover the highly degraded DNA sequence from the challenging sample that failed standard DNA profiling approaches.
• A fast, sensitive, and low-cost strategy that combines the strengths of protein analysis and DNA analysis for kinship identification in forensic research.
Funder
Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference41 articles.
1. Gill P, Jeffreys AJ, Werrett DJ (1985) Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’. Nature 318:577–579. https://doi.org/10.1038/318577a0
2. Butler JM (2015) The future of forensic DNA analysis. Philos Trans R Soc B 37:180–195. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0252
3. Kaur L, Sharma SG (2022) Forensic DNA analysis: a powerful investigative tool. In: Singh J, Sharma NR (eds) Crime scene management within forensic science-forensic techniques for criminal. Springer, Singapore
4. Steendam KV, Ceuleneer MD, Dhaenens M, Hoofstat DV, Deforce D (2013) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as a tool to identify biological matrices in forensic science. Inernational Journal of Legal Medicine 127:287–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-012-0747-x
5. Akihisa I, Yusuke D, Koichi S (2015) Identification and evaluation of potential forensic marker proteins in vaginal fluid by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:7135–7144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8877-x
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献