Abstract
AbstractThe concept of negative partisanship has lately become a highly salient topic, yet its current measurements are far from optimal as they do not account for negative partisanship’s nature as a social identity, nor are they applicable to multiparty systems. In this paper, we validate the negative partisanship (NPS) scale. By relying on expert interviews, cognitive pre-tests and a large-N survey in two countries, Germany (N = 1,911) and Italy (N = 1,440), we provide a construct validation using a nomological network based on previous studies and social identity literature. Our results show the applicability of the new instrument, the full five-item version as well as shorter conceptualizations, for the measurement of negative partisanship in multiparty systems.
Funder
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Statistics and Probability
Reference55 articles.
1. Abramowitz, A., Webster, S.: The rise of negative partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral. Stud. 41, 12–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
2. Abramowitz, A., Webster, S.: Negative partisanship: Why americans dislike parties but behave like Rabid. Partisans Political Psychology. 39(1), 119–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479
3. Areal, J.: Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil. Political Res. Exchange: ECPR J. 4(1), 2117635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2117635
4. Bankert, A.: Negative and positive partisanship in the 2016 U.S. Presidential elections. Polit. Behav. 43(4), 1467–1485 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09599-1
5. Bartle, J., Belluci, P.: Partisanship, Social Identity, and individual attitudes. In: Bartle, J., Bellucci, P. (eds.) Political Parties and Partisanship: Social Identity and Individual Attitudes. Routledge, London (2009)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献