Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) is an individualised tool designed for adults but used with children without any evidence of validation in this population. Individualised instruments are patient-specific rather than disease-specific and therefore can be applied across various health conditions. This study sought to adapt, and content validate the MYMOP for application in 7–11 year old children.
Methods
There were two main phases of the four iterations: expert consultation (three rounds) and interviews with child-parent pairs at the Outpatient clinics of a Children’s Hospital. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an inductive, interpretative approach.
Results
Four paediatricians completed the first survey, five paediatricians participated in the focus group, and four paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQOL) research experts completed the second survey. Several changes were recommended to the MYMOP by the expert groups. Twenty-five children (17 general medicine, and 8 diabetes/endocrine clinic) aged 7–11 years completed the draft paediatric MYMOP (P-MYMOP) and were interviewed. Results demonstrated that the majority of participants were able to identify their own problems and activity limitations, and all participants understood the 7-point faces scale. Most parents and children perceived that the P-MYMOP would be useful to complete before clinic appointments.
Conclusions
The P-MYMOP is the first content-validated generic individualised HRQOL measure for children 7–11 years old. Given that validation is an iterative process, further research to assess its feasibility, reliability, and construct validity is required.
Funder
Faculty of Sciences, University of Adelaide
Flinders University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Clinch, J., Tugwell, P., Wells, G., & Shea, B. (2001). Individualized functional priority approach to the assessment of health-related quality of life in rheumatology. Journal of Rheumatology, 28(2), 445–451.
2. Bowling, A. (1995). What things are important in people’s lives? A survey of the public’s judgements to inform scales of health-related quality of life. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1447–1462.
3. Wiering, B., de Boer, D., & Delnoij, D. (2017). Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: A scoping review. Health Expectations, 20(1), 11–23.
4. Carr, A. J., & Higginson, I. J. (2001). Are quality of life measures patient centred? BMJ, 322(7298), 1357–1360.
5. Mayo, N. E., Aburub, A., Brouillette, M. J., Kuspinar, A., Moriello, C., Rodriguez, A. M., et al. (2017). In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: Comparison between patient generated index and standardized measures across four health conditions. Quality of Life Research, 26(3), 601–609.