Suitability of the animated activity questionnaire for use as computer adaptive test: establishing the AAQ-CAT
-
Published:2023-04-03
Issue:8
Volume:32
Page:2403-2413
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Liegl GregorORCID, Roorda Leo D., Terwee Caroline B., Steultjens Martijn, Roos Ewa M., Guillemin Francis, Benedetti Maria Grazia, Dagfinrud Hanne, de Carvalho Bastone Alessandra, Peter Wilfred F.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The animated activity questionnaire (AAQ) is a computer-based measure of activity limitations. To answer a question, patients choose the animation of a person performing an activity that matches their own level of limitation. The AAQ has not yet been tested for suitability to be applied as computer-adaptive test (CAT). Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an AAQ-based CAT to facilitate the application of the AAQ in daily clinical care.
Methods
Patients (n = 1408) with hip/knee osteoarthritis from Brazil, Denmark, France, The Netherlands, Norway, Spain, and the UK responded to all 17 AAQ items. Assumptions of item-response theory (IRT) modelling were investigated. To establish item parameters for the CAT, a graded response model was estimated. To evaluate the performance of post-hoc simulated AAQ-based CATs, precision, test length, and construct validity (correlations with well-established measures of activity limitations) were evaluated.
Results
Unidimensionality (CFI = 0.95), measurement invariance (R2-change < 2%), and IRT item fit (S-X2p > .003) of the AAQ were supported. Performing simulated CATs, the mean test length was more than halved (≤ 8 items), while the range of precise measurement (standard error ≤ 0.3) was comparable to the full AAQ. The correlations between original AAQ scores and three AAQ-CAT versions were ≥ 0.95. Correlations of AAQ-CAT scores with patient-reported and performance measures of activity limitations were ≥ 0.60.
Conclusion
The almost non-verbal AAQ-CAT is an innovative and efficient tool in patients with hip/knee osteoarthritis from various countries, measuring activity limitations with lower respondent burden, but similar precision and construct validity compared to the full AAQ.
Funder
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico European League Against Rheumatism Arthritis Foundation Anna Foundation Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference49 articles.
1. Pereira, D., Peleteiro, B., Araújo, J., Branco, J., Santos, R. A., & Ramos, E. (2011). The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: A systematic review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 19(11), 1270–1285. 2. Bijlsma, J. W., Berenbaum, F., & Lafeber, F. P. (2011). Osteoarthritis: An update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet, 377(9783), 2115–2126. 3. Smith, T. O., Mansfield, M., Hawker, G. A., Hunter, D. J., March, L. M., Boers, M., Shea, B. J., Christensen, R., Guillemin, F., & Terwee, C. B. (2019). Uptake of the OMERACT-OARSI hip and knee osteoarthritis core outcome set: Review of randomized controlled trials from 1997 to 2017. The Journal of Rheumatology, 46(8), 976–980. 4. Walton, M. K., Powers, J. H., Hobart, J., Patrick, D., Marquis, P., Vamvakas, S., Isaac, M., Molsen, E., Cano, S., & Burke, L. B. (2015). Clinical outcome assessments: Conceptual foundation—Report of the ISPOR clinical outcomes assessment–emerging good practices for outcomes research task force. Value in Health, 18(6), 741–752. 5. Latham, N. K., Mehta, V., Nguyen, A. M., Jette, A. M., Olarsch, S., Papanicolaou, D., & Chandler, J. (2008). Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: Which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(11), 2146–2155.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|