Prevalence vs impact: a mixed methods study of survivorship issues in colorectal cancer
-
Published:2021-08-21
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Drury AmandaORCID, Payne SheilaORCID, Brady Anne-MarieORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to explore the prevalence of CRC survivorship issues and their impact on survivors’ quality of life (QoL).
Methods
This study utilised a mixed methods sequential explanatory design. Adult CRC survivors between 6- and 60-months post-diagnosis (n = 304) were purposively recruited from three hospitals and twenty-one cancer support centres in Ireland. QoL was evaluated using the EuroQol and FACT-C questionnaires and results compared to population norms. 22 survey participants took part in semi-structured interviews exploring the impact of survivorship issues on their daily lives.
Results
While CRC survivors reported QoL outcomes comparable to or better than normative populations, 54% were dissatisfied with their QoL. The most common survivorship issues reported included negative body image (74%), fatigue (68%), sexual dysfunction (66%) and sleep disturbance (59%). Thematic analysis of the qualitative data illustrated survivors’ attempts to live with the impact of cancer and its treatment (loss, fear, impact) and striving to contextualise, reframe and understand the consequences of cancer and its treatment (control, vigilance, benefit). Within these themes, the cross-domain impact of less prevalent symptoms including bowel dysfunction (28–57%) and peripheral neuropathy (47%) were widely discussed.
Conclusions
Although cancer survivors report positive QoL outcomes, many experience distressing physical, psychological and social effects. The findings suggest less common and difficult to manage symptoms are the greatest source of distress and unmet need. Support and information must be tailored to address survivors’ individual needs and preferences for support, informed by holistic person-centred assessment.
Funder
Health Research Board University College Dublin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference54 articles.
1. Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993). The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 11(3), 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570 2. World Health Organisation Quality of Life Group. (1995). The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K 3. Holzner, B., Kemmler, G., Cella, D., De Paoli, C., Meraner, V., Kopp, M., Greil, R., Wolfgang Fleischhacker, W., & Sperner-Unterweger, B. (2004). Normative data for functional assessment of cancer therapy general scale and its use for the interpretation of quality of life scores in cancer survivors. Acta Oncologica, 43(2), 153–160. 4. Arndt, V., Koch-Gallenkamp, L., Jansen, L., Bertram, H., Eberle, A., Holleczek, B., Schmid-Höpfner, S., Waldmann, A., Ruth Zeissig, S., & Brenner, H. (2017). Quality of life in long-term and very long-term cancer survivors versus population controls in Germany. Acta Oncologica, 56(2), 190–197. 5. Wheelwright, S., Permyakova, N. V., Calman, L., Din, A., Fenlon, D., Richardson, A., Sodergren, S., Smith, P. W. F., Winter, J., & Foster, C. (2020). Does quality of life return to pre-treatment levels five years after curative intent surgery for colorectal cancer? Evidence from the ColoREctal wellbeing (CREW) study. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0231332.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|