Author:
Round Jeff,Sampson Elizabeth L.,Jones Louise
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The wide range of tools and methods developed for measuring and valuing health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluations are appropriate for use in most populations. However, for certain populations, specific tools may need to be developed to reflect the particular needs of that population. Patients without capacity—particularly patients with severe dementia—are such a population. At present, the tools available to economists for measuring and valuing quality of life in these patients lack validity. Here, we seek to understand the framework within which common instruments have been developed, critique these instruments with respect to patients with severely restricted capacity and to develop a new way of thinking about how to value health-related quality of life in such patients.
Method
In this essay, we describe and critique the conceptual framework by which common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life have been developed.
Results
We show that current common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life in general populations are not appropriate for populations with severely restricted capacity.
Conclusions
We propose a new framework for thinking about quality of life in this population, based on notions of observable person-centred outcomes and utility derived from processes of care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference42 articles.
1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
2. Briggs, Andrew, Calxton, Karl, & Sculpher, Mark. (1). Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Drummond, Michael F. (2005). MJSGWTBJOaGLS: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research,
21, 167–176.
5. Sclan, S. G., & Reisberg, B. (1992). Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer’s disease: Reliability, validity, and ordinality. International Psychogeriatrics,
4(Suppl 1), 55–69.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献