A framework for understanding quality of life in individuals without capacity

Author:

Round Jeff,Sampson Elizabeth L.,Jones Louise

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The wide range of tools and methods developed for measuring and valuing health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluations are appropriate for use in most populations. However, for certain populations, specific tools may need to be developed to reflect the particular needs of that population. Patients without capacity—particularly patients with severe dementia—are such a population. At present, the tools available to economists for measuring and valuing quality of life in these patients lack validity. Here, we seek to understand the framework within which common instruments have been developed, critique these instruments with respect to patients with severely restricted capacity and to develop a new way of thinking about how to value health-related quality of life in such patients. Method In this essay, we describe and critique the conceptual framework by which common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life have been developed. Results We show that current common instruments used for measuring and valuing quality of life in general populations are not appropriate for populations with severely restricted capacity. Conclusions We propose a new framework for thinking about quality of life in this population, based on notions of observable person-centred outcomes and utility derived from processes of care.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference42 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal; National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

2. Briggs, Andrew, Calxton, Karl, & Sculpher, Mark. (1). Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Drummond, Michael F. (2005). MJSGWTBJOaGLS: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (Vol. 3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21, 167–176.

5. Sclan, S. G., & Reisberg, B. (1992). Functional assessment staging (FAST) in Alzheimer’s disease: Reliability, validity, and ordinality. International Psychogeriatrics, 4(Suppl 1), 55–69.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3