1. Ahn, Y. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT 3.5 on CSAT: Its potential as a language learning and assessment tool. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 22(2), 119–145.
2. Amorim, E., Cançado, M., & Veloso, A. (2018). Automated essay scoring in the presence of biased ratings. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-1021
3. Attali, Y. (2007). Construct validity of e-rater® in scoring TOEFL® essays (ETS Research Report No. RR-07-21). ETS.
4. Bridgeman, B. (2004). E-rater as a quality control on human scorers. Paper presented at the ETS Research Colloquium Series.
5. Burstein, J., & Marcu, D. (2000). Benefits of modularity in an automated essay scoring system. In R. Zajac (Ed.), Proceedings of the COLING-2000 Workshop on Using Toolsets and Architectures To Build NLP Systems (pp. 44–50). 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING.