Types of teacher-AI collaboration in K-12 classroom instruction: Chinese teachers’ perspective
-
Published:2024-02-23
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1360-2357
-
Container-title:Education and Information Technologies
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Educ Inf Technol
Abstract
AbstractThe advancing power and capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) have expanded the roles of AI in education and have created the possibility for teachers to collaborate with AI in classroom instruction. However, the potential types of teacher-AI collaboration (TAC) in classroom instruction and the benefits and challenges of implementing TAC are still elusive. This study, therefore, aimed to explore different types of TAC and the potential benefits and obstacles of TAC through Focus Group Interviews with 30 Chinese teachers. The study found that teachers anticipated six types of TAC, which are thematized as One Teach, One Observe; One Teach, One Assist; Co-teaching in Stations; Parallel Teaching in Online and Offline Classes; Differentiated Teaching; and Team Teaching. While teachers highlighted that TAC could support them in instructional design, teaching delivery, teacher professional development, and lowering grading load, they perceived a lack of explicit and consistent curriculum guidance, the dominance of commercial AI in schools, the absence of clear ethical guidelines, and teachers' negative attitude toward AI as obstacles to TAC. These findings enhance our understanding of how TAC could be structured at school levels and direct the implications for future development and practice to support TAC.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference77 articles.
1. Abdelaziz, H. (2019). The impact of AI on curriculum systems: Towards an orbit-shifting dialogue. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371258. Accessed 17 Feb 2023. 2. Akata, Z., Balliet, D., De Rijke, M., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Eiben, G., Fokkens, A., Grossi, D., Hindriks, K., Hoos, H., Hung, H., Jonker, C., Monz, C., Neerincx, M. A., Oliehoek, F., Prakken, H., Schlobach, S., van der Gaag, L. C., van Harmelen, F., …, & Welling, M. (2020). A research agenda for hybrid intelligence: Augmenting human intellect with collaborative, adaptive, responsible, and explainable artificial intelligence. Computer, 53(8), 18–28. 3. Amado, L., & Jarque, S. (2022). Effectiveness of a multimodal intervention on social climate (school and family) and performance in mathematics of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mathematics, 10(17), 3133. 4. Anderson, G. J., Panneer, S., Shi, M., Marshall, C. S., Agrawal, A., Chierichetti, R., ..., & Durham, L. M. (2018). Kid space: Interactive learning in a smart environment. In Proceedings of the Group Interaction Frontiers in Technology (pp. 1–9). 5. Bietti, E. (2020). From ethics washing to ethics bashing: A view on tech ethics from within moral philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 210–219).
|
|