Abstract
AbstractUterus transplantation (UTx) research has been introduced in several countries, with trials in Sweden and the United States producing successful outcomes. The growing interest in developing UTx trials in other countries, such as Spain, the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia, raises important questions regarding the ethics of surgical innovation research in the field of UTx. This paper examines the current state of UTx in the context of the surgical innovation paradigm and IDEAL framework and discusses the ethical challenges faced by those considering the introduction of new trials. We argue that UTx remains an experimental procedure at a relatively early stage of the IDEAL framework, especially in the context of de novo trials, where protocols are likely to deviate from those used previously and where researchers are likely to have limited experience of UTx. We conclude that countries considering the introduction of UTx trials should build on the strengths of the reported outcomes to consolidate the evidence base and shed light on the uncertainties of the procedure. Authorities responsible for the ethical governance of UTx trials are advised to draw on the ethical framework used in the oversight of surgical innovation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science)
Reference87 articles.
1. Abdeldayem, H., S. Kashkoush, B.S. Hegab, A. Aziz, H. Shoreem, and S. Saleh. 2014. Analysis of donor motivations in living donor liver transplantation. Frontiers in Surgery 8(1): 1–4.
2. Allyse, M., H. Amer, C. Coutifaris, et al. 2018. American Society for Reproductive Medicine position statement on uterus transplantation: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 110(4): 605–610.
3. Ayoubi, J.M., M. Carbonnel, P. Pirtea, N. Kvarnström, M. Brännström, and P. Dahm-Kähler. 2019. Laparotomy or minimal invasive surgery in uterus transplantation: A comparison. Fertility and Sterility 112(1): 11–18.
4. Balayla, J. 2016. Uterine transplants in the Canadian setting: A theoretical framework. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 38(10): 955–960.
5. Barkun, J.S., J.K. Aronson, L.S. Feldman, G.J. Maddern, and S.M. Strasberg. 2009. Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. The Lancet 374(9695): 1089–1096.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Greffe laryngée après laryngectomie totale chez l’homme : analyse SWiM;Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale;2024-04
2. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome (MRKH);Genetic Syndromes;2024
3. Laryngeal graft after total laryngectomy in humans: A SWiM analysis;European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases;2023-12
4. Ethics, Politics, and Minorities;Journal of Bioethical Inquiry;2023-09