Abstract
AbstractResearch indicates that to adjust a group’s emotional atmosphere for successful collaborative learning, group members need to engage in group-level emotion regulation. However, less is known about the whys and ways regulation is activated at a group level. This research explores what triggers 12-year-old primary school students’ (N = 37) negative socio-emotional interactions during a collaborative science task and whether the nature of the trigger makes a difference to group-level emotion regulation strategies and their sequential composition in these interactions. Groups’ collaborative working was videotaped, and triggers and strategies were analysed. The results reveal that the triggers of negative interactions are linked to the groups’ activated regulation strategies. Motivation control strategies were more represented in situations where negative interactions were triggered by task-related issues, whereas socially related triggers were associated with behavioural regulation strategies. Furthermore, the results illustrate that strategies are concatenated to a series of strategic actions, which mostly begin with sharing an awareness of the trigger. The results indicate a need to focus on the series of strategic actions activated in group interactions. This will help reveal how socially shared regulatory processes build a group’s emotional atmosphere.
Funder
academy of finland
suomen kulttuurirahasto
University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Reference69 articles.
1. Andriessen, J., Pardijs, M., & Baker, M. J. (2013). Getting on and getting along: Tension in the development of collaboration. In Baker, M. J., Andriessen, J., & Järvelä, S. (Eds.), Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 205–230). Routledge
2. Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context.. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.003
3. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Log-linear approaches to lag-sequential analysis when consecutive codes may and cannot repeat. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.272
4. Bakhtiar, A., & Hadwin, A. (2020). Dynamic interplay between modes of regulation during motivationally challenging episodes in collaboration.. Frontline Learning Research, 8(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i2.561
5. Bakhtiar, A., Webster, E., & Hadwin, A. (2018). Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 57–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9178-x
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献