Abstract
AbstractNational accounts are subject to major revisions. To improve the reliability of first release data, it is important to know whether subsequent revisions show systematic patterns. Or, in other words, whether national accounts are informationally efficient in the sense that all available information is incorporated into the data. This paper used annual data to test three dimensions of informational efficiency: weak efficiency, strong efficiency, and Nordhaus efficiency. The weak efficiency tests found GDP revisions to be noise, whereas revisions of several GDP components showed systematic patterns. Strong efficiency tests found covariations of GDP revisions with some indicators. Business survey results in particular have the potential to reduce the extent of revisions. Finally, Nordhaus efficiency tests found some indication of revision stickiness.
Funder
RWI – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management
Reference21 articles.
1. Ahmad, N., Bournot, S., & Koechlin, F. (2004) Revisions to quarterly GDP estimates: a comparative analysis for seven large OECD countries. Paper presented at the OECD-ONS Workshop Assessing and improving statistical quality-Revisions analyses for national accounts, London.
2. Boysen-Hogreve, J. & Neuwirth, S. (2012). The impact of seasonal and price adjustments in the predictability of German GDP revisions. Kiel Working Paper 1753.
3. Döhrn, R. (2019). Revisionen der volkswirtschaftlichen gesamtrechnungen und ihre auswirkungen auf prognosen (revisions of national accounts and their impact on forecasts). AStA Wirtschafts-und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, 13(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11943-019-00251-x
4. Faust, J., Rogers, J. H., & Wright, J. H. (2005). News and noise in G-7 GDP announcements. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 37(3), 403–419.
5. Garatt, A., Koop, G., & Vahey, S. P. (2008). Forecasting substantial data revisions in the presence of model uncertainty. Economic Journal, 117(430), 1128–1144.