Author:
Allen Ryan W.,Barn Prabjit
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
We reviewed recent peer-reviewed literature on three categories of individual- and household-level interventions against air pollution: air purifiers, facemasks, and behavior change.
Recent Findings
High-efficiency particulate air/arresting (HEPA) filter air purifier use over days to weeks can substantially reduce fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations indoors and improve subclinical cardiopulmonary health. Modeling studies suggest that the population-level benefits of HEPA filter air purification would often exceed costs. Well-fitting N95 and equivalent respirators can reduce PM2.5 exposure, with several randomized crossover studies also reporting improvements in subclinical cardiovascular health. The health benefits of other types of face coverings have not been tested and their effectiveness in reducing exposure is highly variable, depends largely on fit, and is unrelated to cost. Behavior modifications may reduce exposure, but there has been little research on health impacts.
Summary
There is now substantial evidence that HEPA filter air purifiers reduce indoor PM2.5 concentrations and improve subclinical health indicators. As a result, their use is being recommended by a growing number of government and public health organizations. Several studies have also reported subclinical cardiovascular health benefits from well-fitting respirators, while evidence of health benefits from other types of facemasks and behavior changes remains very limited. In situations when emissions cannot be controlled at the source, such as during forest fires, individual- or household-level interventions may be the primary option. In most cases, however, such interventions should be supplemental to emission reduction efforts that benefit entire communities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation
Reference143 articles.
1. Health Effects Institute. State of Global Air 2019. Special Report. 2019. https://www.stateofglobalair.org/sites/default/files/soga_2019_report.pdf.
2. Pope CA, et al. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:376–86.
3. Samet JM. The clean air act and health — a clearer view from 2011. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:198–201. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1103332.
4. Schraufnagel DE, Balmes JR, de Matteis S, Hoffman B, Kim WJ, Perez-Padilla R, et al. Health benefits of air pollution reduction. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16:1478–87.
5. Burnett R, Chen H, Szyszkowicz M, Fann N, Hubbell B, Pope CA III, et al. Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:9592–7.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献