Predicting global numbers of teleomorphic ascomycetes
-
Published:2022-02-17
Issue:1
Volume:114
Page:237-278
-
ISSN:1560-2745
-
Container-title:Fungal Diversity
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Fungal Diversity
Author:
Senanayake Indunil C.ORCID, Pem Dhandevi, Rathnayaka Achala R.ORCID, Wijesinghe Subodini N.ORCID, Tibpromma SaowaluckORCID, Wanasinghe Dhanushka N.ORCID, Phookamsak RungtiwaORCID, Kularathnage Nuwan D.ORCID, Gomdola DeeckshaORCID, Harishchandra DulanjaleeORCID, Dissanayake Lakmali S.ORCID, Xiang Mei-mei, Ekanayaka Anusha H., McKenzie Eric H. C.ORCID, Hyde Kevin D.ORCID, Zhang Hao-xing, Xie Ning
Abstract
AbstractSexual reproduction is the basic way to form high genetic diversity and it is beneficial in evolution and speciation of fungi. The global diversity of teleomorphic species in Ascomycota has not been estimated. This paper estimates the species number for sexual ascomycetes based on five different estimation approaches, viz. by numbers of described fungi, by fungus:substrate ratio, by ecological distribution, by meta-DNA barcoding or culture-independent studies and by previous estimates of species in Ascomycota. The assumptions were made with the currently most accepted, “2.2–3.8 million” species estimate and results of previous studies concluding that 90% of the described ascomycetes reproduce sexually. The Catalogue of Life, Species Fungorum and published research were used for data procurement. The average value of teleomorphic species in Ascomycota from all methods is 1.86 million, ranging from 1.37 to 2.56 million. However, only around 83,000 teleomorphic species have been described in Ascomycota and deposited in data repositories. The ratio between described teleomorphic ascomycetes to predicted teleomorphic ascomycetes is 1:22. Therefore, where are the undiscovered teleomorphic ascomycetes? The undescribed species are no doubt to be found in biodiversity hot spots, poorly-studied areas and species complexes. Other poorly studied niches include extremophiles, lichenicolous fungi, human pathogens, marine fungi, and fungicolous fungi. Undescribed species are present in unexamined collections in specimen repositories or incompletely described earlier species. Nomenclatural issues, such as the use of separate names for teleomorph and anamorphs, synonyms, conspecific names, illegitimate and invalid names also affect the number of described species. Interspecies introgression results in new species, while species numbers are reduced by extinctions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference495 articles.
1. Abdel-Wahab MA, Nagahama T (2011) Gesasha (Halosphaeriaceae, Ascomycota), a new genus with three new species from the Gesashi mangroves in Japan. Nova Hedwigia 92:497–512 2. Abdel-Wahab MA, Pang KL, Nagahama T, Abdel-Aziz F, Jones EBG (2010) Phylogenetic evaluation of anamorphic species of Cirrenalia and Cumulospora with the description of eight new genera and four new species. Mycol Prog 9:537–558 3. Acton J, Sandler N (2008) Mushroom. Kyle Cathie, London, p 160 4. Agerer R, Ammirati JF, Blanz P, Courtecuisse R, Desjardin DE, Gams W, Hallenberg N, Halling R, Hawksworth DL, Horak E, Korf RP, Mueller GM, Oberwinkler F, Rambold G, Summerbell RC, Triebel D, Watling R (2000) Always deposit vouchers. Mycol Res 104(6):642–644 5. Aime MC, Miller AN, Aoki T, Bensch K, Cai L, Crous PW, Hawksworth DL, Hyde KD, Kirk PM, Lücking R, May TW, Malosso E, Redhead SA, Rossman AY, Stadler M, Thines M, Yurkov AM, Zhang N, Schoch CL (2021) How to publish a new fungal species, or name, version 3.0. IMA Fungus 12:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43008-021-00063-1
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|