Abstract
AbstractEngagement with genomic medicine and research has increased globally during the past few decades, including rapid developments in Sri Lanka. Genomic research is carried out in Sri Lanka on a variety of scales and with different aims and perspectives. However, there are concerns about participants' understanding of genomic research, including the validity of informed consent. This article reports a qualitative study aiming to explore the understanding, knowledge, and attitudes of the Sri Lankan public towards genomic medicine and to inform the development of an effective and appropriate process for informed consent in that setting. Purposive sampling was employed. Participants were recruited from a sub-group of the public in Colombo, Sri Lanka who had either consented or refused to donate genetic material for a biobank. Data were collected using face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Interview data were transcribed verbatim and translated into English. Conventional content analysis was used. The analysis developed three key themes: a) ‘Scientific literacy’ describes an apparent lack of scientific knowledge that seems to affect a participant’s ability to understand the research, b) ‘Motivation’ describes narratives about why participants chose (not) to take part in the research, despite not understanding it, and c) ‘Trust’ describes how trust served to mitigate the apparent ethical deficit created by not being fully informed. In this article, we argue that informed trust is likely an acceptable basis for consent, particularly in settings where scientific literacy might be low. However, researchers must work to be worthy of that trust and ensure that misconceptions are actively addressed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Philosophy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference41 articles.
1. Adlan, A. A. A. 2015. The Biomedical Ethics of Donating Blood for Molecular and Genetics Research in Saudi Arabia. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham. https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/6085/1/Adlan15PhD.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2023.
2. Ahram, M., F. Abdelgawad, S.A. ElHafeez, A.S. Abdelhafiz, M.E. Ibrahim, A. Elgamri. 2022. Perceptions, attitudes, and willingness of the public in low- and middle-income countries of the Arab region to participate in biobank research. BMC Medical Ethics 23: 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00855-z
3. Aro, A.R., A. Hakonen, M. Hietala, J. Lönnqvist, P. Niemelä, L. Peltonen, and P. Aula. 1997. Acceptance of Genetic Testing in a General Population: Age, Education and Gender Differences. Patient Education and Counseling 32 (1–2): 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(97)00061-x.
4. Banks, S. 2018. Cultivating Researcher Integrity: Virtue-Based Approaches to Research Ethics. In Virtue Ethics in the Conduct and Governance of Social Science Research (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity), Volume 3, ed. N. Emmerich, 21–44. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000003002Bloss.
5. Bukini, D., C. Mbekenga, S. Nkya, L. Purvis, S. McCurdy, M. Parker, and J. Makani. 2020. A Qualitative Study on Aspects of Consent for Genomic Research in Communities with Low Literacy. BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00488-0.