Implementation strategies preferred by primary care clinicians to facilitate cancer prevention and control activities
-
Published:2023-04-08
Issue:5
Volume:46
Page:821-836
-
ISSN:0160-7715
-
Container-title:Journal of Behavioral Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Behav Med
Author:
Glasgow Russell E.ORCID, Brtnikova Michaela, Dickinson L. Miriam, Carroll Jennifer K., Studts Jamie L.
Abstract
AbstractKey clinical and community members need to be involved in the identification of feasible and impactful implementation strategies for translation of evidence-based interventions into practice. While a wide range of implementation strategies has been developed, there is little research on their applicability for cancer prevention and control (CPC) efforts in primary care. We conducted a survey of primary care physicians to identify implementation strategies they perceive as most feasible and impactful. The survey included both primary prevention behavior change counseling and cancer screening issues. Analyses contrasted ratings of feasibility and impact of nine implementation strategies, and among clinicians in different settings with a focus on comparisons between clinicians in rural vs. non-rural settings. We recruited a convenience sample of 326 respondents from a wide range of practice types from four practice-based research networks in 49 states and including 177 clinicians in rural settings. Ratings of impact were somewhat higher than those for feasibility. Few of the nine implementation strategies were high on both impact and feasibility. Only ‘adapting to my practice’ was rated higher than a 4 (“moderate”) on both impact and feasibility. There were relatively few differences between rural and non-rural clinicians or associated with other clinician or setting characteristics. There is considerable variability in perceived impact and feasibility of implementation strategies for CPC activities among family medicine clinicians. It is important to assess both feasibility and impact of implementation strategies as well as their generalizability across settings. Our results suggest that optimal strategies to implement evidence-based CPC activities will likely need to be adapted for primary care settings. Future research is needed to replicate these findings and identify practical, implementation partner informed implementation strategies.
Funder
National Cancer Institute - Implementation Science Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,General Psychology
Reference38 articles.
1. Blake, K. D., Moss, J. L., Gaysynsky, A., Srinivasan, S., & Croyle, R. T. (2017). Making the case for investment in rural cancer control: an analysis of rural cancer incidence, mortality, and funding trends. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 26(7), 992–997. 2. Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (2017). Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. 3. Brtnikova, M., Studts, J. L., Robertson, E., Dickinson, L. M., Carroll, J. K., Krist, A. H., Cronin, J. T., & Glasgow, R. E. (2022). Priorities for improvement across cancer and non-cancer related preventive services among rural and non-rural clinicians. BMC Primary Care, 23(1), 231. 4. Brtnikova, M., Crane, L. A., Allison, M. A., Hurley, L. P., Beaty, B. L., & Kempe, A. (2018). A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0202755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202755 5. Brtnikova, M., Studts, J. L., Robertson, E., Dickinson, L. M., Carroll, J. K., Krist, A. H., et al. (2022). Priorities for improvement across cancer and non-cancer related preventive services among rural and non-rural clinicians. BMC Prim Care., 23(1), 231.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|