Public Health Policymaking, Politics, and Evidence

Author:

Kothari Anita,Smith Maxwell J.

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter explores the gradient of public health engagement and relationships with politics and political science. On one hand, public health values evidence-based decision-making grounded in orthodox hierarchies of evidence, while on the other, by nature of the issues, there are challenges to obtaining this data and to omitting values and contextual considerations. Additionally, public health competes with other health sectors for time and funding which makes political spheres difficult to break into as public health researchers. Apart from some critical public health scholars, many public health researchers have limited knowledge of policy-related concepts. This chapter describes a gradual shift from evidence-based to evidence-informed decision-making in policy, and what this means for conceptualizing policymaking and politics from a public health lens. Most importantly, the chapter describes the importance of the community as the space from which issues are identified, evidence is generated, and solutions are contextually bound.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference55 articles.

1. Ashton, J. R. (2006). Virchow misquoted, part-quoted, and the real McCoy. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(8), 671–671.

2. Bambra, C., Fox, D., & Scott-Samuel, A. (2005). Towards a politics of health. Health Promotion International, 20(2), 187–193.

3. Cairney, P. (2016) The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave.

4. Clavier, C., Gagnon, F., & Poland, B. (2022). Sidestepping the stalemate. The strategies of public health actors for circulating evidence into the policy process. In P. Fafard, A. Cassola, & E. De Leeuw (Eds.), Integrating science and politics for public health. Palgrave Springer.

5. Crammond, B. R., & Carey, G. (2017). Policy change for the social determinants of health: The strange irrelevance of social epidemiology. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 13(2), 365–374.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A cautionary tale: university institutes of public health must “walk the talk”;Canadian Journal of Public Health;2023-08-29

2. How Policy Appetites Shape, and Are Shaped by Evidence Production and Use;Integrating Science and Politics for Public Health;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3